“a yeasty system where the rule of law isn’t always followed.”
Green Energy

“a yeasty system where the rule of law isn’t always followed.”



Former Dem. Mayor of Philadelphia, and Gov. Ed Rendell, on Pennsylvania’s voting records.
This week a federal court REFUSED to block a voter ID law in Pennsylvania where John Kerry whipped Bush in 2004 by 150k votes out of nearly 6 million cast with an 81% margin in Phila. Now a number like that brings to mind names like, Mubarak, Chenenko, Kim, and Saddam. Nor is this as, John Fund points out, a DEMOCRATIC PARTY ISSUE.
Republicans are convinced that voter-ID laws coupled with absentee-ballot protections will cut down on fraud, and in areas like Philadelphia will lead to lower Democratic margins. The more honest among them acknowledge that the city has long been a fount of corruption, including when Republicans ran a machine that dominated it for 80 years until the 1950s. During that period, not a single Democrat was elected mayor, in part because of massive Republican-led voter fraud. All that changed after Democrats seized control of the levers of city power was that they perfected what former Democratic mayor Ed Rendell once admitted to me was “a yeasty system where the rule of law isn’t always followed.”
We can argue that ‘certain’ votes WILL be suppressed by a voter ID law, and if you have to pay for photo ID, IMHO, it IS a poll tax (unconstitutional). But in the end, there is NO ARGUMENT that more accurate control of those who should NOT VOTE only enhances the legitimacy of self rule.
In the 1990’s a court decision in PA, threw out an election which determined control of their Senate BECAUSE of voter fraud.
In 2008 the Supreme Court 6-3 upheld voter ID in Indiana.
Just because this SEEMS to be feared more by the democrats more now than the replublicans is a temporary phenomenon much like the discussions about killing the 60 vote cloture rule in the US Senate over debate (which one must notice has cooled considerably on the democratic side as republican chances to control the Senate have increased somewhat..but no way they hit 60).
However, given the idea that the vote controls the rule, the self rule of the nation, I cannot imagine a more corrosive idea to the nation than that which would result from the FEELING that an election result is illegitimate, not due to some artifice, such as what occurred in FLORIDA in 2000.
While the Supreme Court at least settled that in manner consistent with the will of the people over MANY elections (that’s who appointed the men and women via majorities elected in the Senate, and by each state for the Pres.), imagine if Richard Nixon had challenged the 1960 election because of dead people providing the margin of victory in Illinois for JFK?
Given the polarization of this nation the very last thing we need is a series of battles in close electoral college results, state by state where a large urban vote determined a different outcome than the entire rest of the state, and Ed Rendell’s personal observation of court agreed facts hangs over us all. This would occur, remember, between Nov 6th, and ~Jan 20th, the inauguration day for the next President. The court battles COULD NOT EXTEND PAST THAT DATE, and there is no tool we have for delaying that moment, nor should there be one.
Think we have divisions now? Just imagine a close electoral college result and challenges like this in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, New Hampshire, Wisconsin SIMULTANEOUSLY.
Give that about 60 seconds of thought about what would be going on here.
Voter ID is COMPULSORY before we hit that moment, and that is why.
This is not 1965 in Mississippi.




- Scotus Situation We Have Now Has Occurred Only Once Before And Really Not Even Then
We are looking for a SCOTUS nomination that occurred in the last year of a presidency, and therefore in an election year, when the Senate was held by the opposite party of the president. 1880, Justice William Burnham Woods nominated by Rutherford B Hayes,...

- Poll Too Much To Hope For Battleground Poll 10/29 … Romney Wins 52-47, And In Ohio
Maybe this explains Obama becoming really weird.Reported by Weekly Std, Human Events, Fox News, and the Inquisitor. Politico which partners with Battleground, did NOT report this, and carries the news that Obama has pulled back into the lead.New Projection...

- Note To The Black Panthers And Seiu. . .
Newsmax: GOP Moves to Tighten Vote Rules in 13 States Sunday, 29 May 2011 12:39 PM By Hiram Reisner Seeking to preserve the integrity of the election process, GOP-controlled statehouses nationwide are stiffening voting laws with changes that include requiring...

- 2004 , Philly Rigged Voting Machines That Showed Nearly 2,000 Votes For Democratic Presidential Candidate John Kerry Before The Polls Had Opened ..and Now ..monitors Ejected
Townhall: A Repeat of 2004 Philly Voter Chaos, Fraud Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:46 AM EXCLUSIVE, DEVELOPING--...

- Fbi Investigates Acorn For Voter Fraud
From AP: WASHINGTON (AP) - The FBI is investigating whether the community activist group ACORN helped foster voter registration fraud around the nation before the presidential election.A senior law enforcement official confirmed the investigation to...



Green Energy








.