“the nation’s surveillance court has created a secret body of law”
Green Energy

“the nation’s surveillance court has created a secret body of law”


The NYT describing the NSA and their WHAT?
The rulings, some nearly 100 pages long, reveal that the court has taken on a much more expansive role by regularly assessing broad constitutional questions and establishing important judicial precedents, with almost no public scrutiny, according to current and former officials familiar with the court’s classified decisions.
The 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as the FISA court, was once mostly focused on approving case-by-case wiretapping orders. But since major changes in legislation and greaterjudicial oversight of intelligence operations were instituted six years ago, it has quietly become almost a parallel Supreme Court, serving as the ultimate arbiter on surveillance issues and delivering opinions that will most likely shape intelligence practices for years to come, the officials said.
Last month, a former National Security Agency contractor, Edward J. Snowden, leaked a classified order from the FISA court, which authorized thecollection of all phone-tracing data from Verizon business customers. But the court’s still-secret decisions go far beyond any single surveillance order, the officials said.
“We’ve seen a growing body of law from the court,” a former intelligence official said. “What you have is a common law that develops where the court is issuing orders involving particular types of surveillance, particular types of targets.”
In one of the court’s most important decisions, the judges have expanded the use in terrorism cases of a legal principle known as the “special needs” doctrine and carved out an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a warrant for searches and seizures, the officials said.
The special needs doctrine was originally established in 1989 by the Supreme Court in a ruling allowing the drug testing of railway workers, finding that a minimal intrusion on privacy was justified by the government’s need to combat an overriding public danger.
The Star Chamber (Latin: Camera stellata) was an English court of law that sat at the royal Palace of Westminster until 1641. It was made up of Privy Councillors, as well as common-law judges and supplemented the activities of the common-law and equity courts in both civil and criminal matters. The court was set up to ensure the fair enforcement of laws against prominent people, those so powerful that ordinary courts could never convict them of their crimes. Court sessions were held insecret, with no indictments, and no witnesses. Evidence was presented in writing. Over time it evolved into a political weapon, a symbol of the misuse and abuse of power by the English monarchy and courts.
The Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB, is a fifteen-member United States Government agency created in 2010 by sections 3403 and 10320 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which has the explicit task of achieving specified savings in Medicare without affecting coverage or quality.[1] Under previous and current law, changes to Medicare payment rates and program rules are recommended by MedPAC but require an act of Congress to take effect. The new system grants IPAB the authority to make changes to the Medicare program with the Congress being given the power to overrule the agency’s decisions through supermajority vote.
Are we clear on the direction of govt in the United States and it’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL and EXTRACONSTITUTIONAL NATURE?
Are we clear on the fate of those in opposition?
FBI investigators have not contacted any of the 41 conservative groups involved in class-action IRS lawsuit

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/02/fbi-investigators-have-not-contacted-any-of-the-41-conservative-groups-involved-in-class-action-irs-lawsuit/#ixzz2YNTKn89g
The IRS is a tool, and the FBI cowed.
Exactly who is serving the people?




- Secret Court Approves Classified Rule Change On How Fbi Can Use Nsa Data
Secret court approves classified rule change on how FBI can use NSA data On Tuesday, The Guardian reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has changed its rules regarding how it redacts Americans’ information when it takes international...

- Federal Appeals Court Rules Nsa's Collection Of Phone Records Not Authorized By 'patriot Act'
From The Hill: A federal court has decided that the National Security Agency’s (NSA) bulk, warrantless collection of millions of Americans’ phone records is illegal. The decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday represents...

- White House Tries To Prevent Judge From Ruling On The Constitutionality Of Nsa Surveillance
They say it's Constitutional, but they don't want Judges to consider it's Constitutionality. Executive Branch Privilege, I guess. WASHINGTON — The Obama administration moved late Friday to prevent a federal judge in California from ruling...

- Judge Throws Out ‘state Secrets’ Claim, Allowing Lawsuit Against Nsa To Continue
From Will at THE OTHER NEWS: Judge throws out ‘state secrets’ claim, allowing lawsuit against NSA to continue.HT:RussiaToday. The suit, known as Jewel vs. National Security Agency, was originally filed in 2008 by the Electronic Frontier Foundation...

-
Obama Threatens The Supreme Court… Again   According to the Canada Free Press, Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court threatening that if...



Green Energy








.