Green Energy
Rep Congressman Says U.S. Should Use Nuclear Weapons If It Attacks Iran.When asked if he thinks war is inevitable with Iran, Hunter said, “I sure hope not,” but said if it happens, the U.S. better go big:
HUNTER: I think a ground war in Iran with American boots on the ground would be a horrible thing and I think people like to toss around the fact that we have to stop them in some way from gaining this nuclear capability. I don’t think it’s inevitable but I think if you have to hit Iran, you don’t put boots on the ground, you do it with tactical nuclear devices and you set them back a decade or two or three. I think that’s the way to do it with a massive aerial bombardment campaign.
Hunter — a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — explained that the U.S. experience in those countries have shaped his view. “I think America now knows its limitations in that area and what we can do and do we want to spend 20 years there after we tear it down to build it back up again so that it isn’t run by a crazy tyrannical leader like has happened in, let’s say Iraq and Afghanistan,” he said. Hmmm.....Patton, Rommel and Churchill would have loved this guy.
"Pour les vaincre, messieurs, il nous faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, et toujours de l'audace et la Patrie sera sauvée!" ~ Danton.
To defeat them, gentlemen, we need audacity, more audacity and always audacity and the Homeland will be saved!
-
KAHLILI: Iran admits giving WMDs to terroristsWashington Times:Illustration Nuclear Israel by Alexander Hunter for The Washington TimesIsrael will be obliterated by chemical, microbial and nuclear bombs, Iran is warning, but those weapons...
- The Cost Of "containing" Iran ...
... when there is no such thing as Containing Iran. From Ace: Even if you believe Iran will be rational and not nuke Israel directly or hand off some nukes to their terror front groups to do the job, you simply can't ignore 30 years of history. Iran...
- Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock
Isarel is going to move, with or without us. And soon. The sooner the better though it may send the better part of the mideast up in flames. And Iran is probably (ought to be) expecting it. And they're certainly not going to give a shit what Britain...
- Just 18% Believe Iran Has Stopped Nuclear Weapons Development Program
(Rasmussen Reports) Just 18% of American voters believe that Iran has halted its nuclear weapons program. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 66% disagree and say Iran has not stopped its nuclear weapons program. Twenty-one...
- Why Is The Arab World Backing Away From Iran
From Strategy Page, via Atlas Shrugs: Iran aside, there hasn't been a really noisy response from the Moslem world about Israel's military operations against Lebanon. Notably subdued is the response from the Arab countries; it's mostly been...
Green Energy
Video - Rep Congressman Says U.S. Should Use Nuclear Weapons If It Attacks Iran
From Will at THE OTHER NEWS:
Rep Congressman Says U.S. Should Use Nuclear Weapons If It Attacks Iran.When asked if he thinks war is inevitable with Iran, Hunter said, “I sure hope not,” but said if it happens, the U.S. better go big:
HUNTER: I think a ground war in Iran with American boots on the ground would be a horrible thing and I think people like to toss around the fact that we have to stop them in some way from gaining this nuclear capability. I don’t think it’s inevitable but I think if you have to hit Iran, you don’t put boots on the ground, you do it with tactical nuclear devices and you set them back a decade or two or three. I think that’s the way to do it with a massive aerial bombardment campaign.
Hunter — a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — explained that the U.S. experience in those countries have shaped his view. “I think America now knows its limitations in that area and what we can do and do we want to spend 20 years there after we tear it down to build it back up again so that it isn’t run by a crazy tyrannical leader like has happened in, let’s say Iraq and Afghanistan,” he said. Hmmm.....Patton, Rommel and Churchill would have loved this guy.
"Pour les vaincre, messieurs, il nous faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, et toujours de l'audace et la Patrie sera sauvée!" ~ Danton.
To defeat them, gentlemen, we need audacity, more audacity and always audacity and the Homeland will be saved!
-
KAHLILI: Iran admits giving WMDs to terroristsWashington Times:Illustration Nuclear Israel by Alexander Hunter for The Washington TimesIsrael will be obliterated by chemical, microbial and nuclear bombs, Iran is warning, but those weapons...
- The Cost Of "containing" Iran ...
... when there is no such thing as Containing Iran. From Ace: Even if you believe Iran will be rational and not nuke Israel directly or hand off some nukes to their terror front groups to do the job, you simply can't ignore 30 years of history. Iran...
- Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock
Isarel is going to move, with or without us. And soon. The sooner the better though it may send the better part of the mideast up in flames. And Iran is probably (ought to be) expecting it. And they're certainly not going to give a shit what Britain...
- Just 18% Believe Iran Has Stopped Nuclear Weapons Development Program
(Rasmussen Reports) Just 18% of American voters believe that Iran has halted its nuclear weapons program. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 66% disagree and say Iran has not stopped its nuclear weapons program. Twenty-one...
- Why Is The Arab World Backing Away From Iran
From Strategy Page, via Atlas Shrugs: Iran aside, there hasn't been a really noisy response from the Moslem world about Israel's military operations against Lebanon. Notably subdued is the response from the Arab countries; it's mostly been...