Green Energy



Shoebat: Anti-Muhammad film the result of Muslim Provocateurs?


Via Shoebat:
The Innocence of Muslims and the spark of an Islamic revolution can be linked to a handful of culprits. The mystery is unlocked when we review the original YouTube page of one named Sam Bacile (the same name attributed to the filmmaker at one time). Bacile forgot to cover his tracks, leaving two links to three very crucial videos. On the “Feed” tab are two of those videos.

One features a Muslim named Wisam Abdul Waris, uploaded to YouTube on September 9th (linked from the Bacile page no later than September 10th). Wisam’s video was uploaded to Bacile’s page because Bacile commented on the video. Yet, when one attempts to view the comments, all have been scrubbed and the comment feature disabled, though the comment allegedly made by Sam Bacile appears on the “Feed” tab, just above the video.

The second video on the Sam Bacile “Feed” tab is none other Nader Bakkar, from as far back as May of 2012. This video was added to Bacile’s YouTube page as a “Favorite” about one week prior to the embassy attack in Cairo on 9/11.

The third video is on the “Likes” tab of the Sam Bacile YouTube page. It consists of an interview with an English speaking western woman who converted to Islam.

Why would a supposed Christian filmmaker “like” this video?

Who are these two named Wisam Abdul Waris and Nader Bakkar?

Waris and Bakkar, the two main interests on Sam Bacile’s YouTube channel, were the two men we identified back on September 13th as being the two primary culprits behind the Cairo riots on 9/11.

These two have been conspicuously absent, all along, from all western media narratives. For example, days after the attacks in Egypt and Libya, Reuters reported an incomplete narrative that the “flashpoint” of the violence was when Sheikh Khalid Abdallah on Al-Nas TV in Egypt aired portions of the film Innocence of Muslims.

The clip Reuters is referring to (uploaded September 9th) was a TV interview on al-Nas, where Sheikh Khalid Abdallah interviewed an activist named Mohammad Hamdy, who was engaged in a blatant form of guilt by association, creating a link between the Copts in Egypt and the Copts in the Diaspora. He blamed all Copts worldwide, not just the ones involved in the film.

Then came these two on September 9th, Wisam Abdul Waris, a Salafist who announced the formation of a new organization, the Coalition of Dar al-Hekma, an activist group wanting to enforce blasphemy laws worldwide and especially in the West. Nader Bakkar was the head of the Nour Salafist party, who gladly announced his new membership in the coalition on the day these two condemned the film.

Contrary to what Reuters reported, what caused the riots was when Waris called in to Khalid to promote them. Khalid simply asked for the date and accepted the invitation. The details and evidence of how the riots erupted by these two was explained here. The rest is history.

The conclusion is that all evidence reveals a small circle of predators—the filmmaker and two individuals prominently displayed on the Sam Bacile YouTube channel.

Wisam and Bakkar planned and executed the riots.
Read it all. There's a lot more...





- Where Did The Nakoula Video Come From And Where Did It Go?
Have you ever noticed that, after the Obama Administration blamed protests in Cairo and Benghazi on the Nakoula video, the video just vanished from the scene, no one ever spoke of it again, least of all angry Muslims? It's almost as if the video...

-
New York Times interview with Innocence of Muslims filmmaker raises question about YouTube channelFROM BARRACK NOW: There was an interesting tidbit found toward the end of a 6-page article written by Serge Kovaleski and Brooks Barnes of the New...

-
"Innocence Of Muslims" - Welcome to Pallywood II By W.Shoebat.When it comes to the film Innocence of Muslims, our government and the media uses a narrative mired in contradictions and false statements provided by the filmmaker, who himself is an...

- Walid Shoebat Says, "innocence Of Muslims Film Was Made By Terrorists."
AND STILL, THE MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT HE HAS DONE. IT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. IMPORTANT QUOTE FROM THE SHOEBAT ARTICLE: So who funded the film? Nakoula claimed that he produced the film with money ($50,000 to $60,000) that came...

- Romney Calls Obama Administration Response To Libya Attacks ‘disgraceful’
Barack Obama, the State Dept., and Hilary Clinton herself, first apologized for the film. I don't think they have changed course since then. So, it is true, their first act was to apologize to our enemies. The fact that the Jihadist attack was successful...



Green Energy








.