Green Energy



Muslim Testifies Against Islamism to Congress


From Rusty at Jawa:

I missed Rep. King's hearing this morning on homegrown radicalism. If any one sees the footage up at YouTube or elsewhere, do me a favor and drop a line. Here is the text delivered by Dr. Zuhdi Jasser on why we need to focus not only on violent extremism, but also the ideological roots of that extremism which is found in political Islam more generally.

His basic argument can be summed up, I think, in: 1) One does not have to support violence in order to be an extremist (eg, someone who supports non-violent implementation of sharia which denies basic human rights such as the right to leave one's religion); 2) Those who do support violent Islamism first supported Islamism (ie, violence is only a tactic of the larger phenomenon, the larger phenomenon being the root problem.

Here's a taste:
As a faith community, focusing on the militants and violence alone is an exercise in futility which gives non-violent Islamists the ability to appear mainstream. Focusing only on violence forces non-Muslims to approach the issue of radicalization in an overly simplistic binary approach of--- good Muslim nonviolent, bad Muslim violent. 
The reality is that Muslims who are violent extremists do not become so overnight. They come to that endpoint along with common travelers within the global supremacist political movement which is Islamism or political Islam. Islamism defined is the desire of some Muslims to create Islamic states or societies based in the interpretation of Islamic law (shariah) by faith leaders where the Muslim community (ummah) is also synonymous with the "Islamic nation-state". 
These quasi-oligarchical leaders can be imams, clerics, or Islamist scholars who believe that their expertise gives them the right to determine and impose their interpretations of religion upon Muslim masses. Thus, Islamists ensnared in the theo-political movement of Islamism are inherently unable to identify with and bond positively to our own American concept of a nation based in an Establishment Clause, the separation of mosque and state, a manmade Constitution and reason.
Read the rest.




- The Word Radical Islam Doesn't Cut It
Now that the words Radical Islam is being bounced about more and more in more quarters, I propose that the words are not good enough. Jihadism is fine. It defines the ACT of violent beliefs in Islam. But the word Radical Islam is not enough. It doesn't...

- Professor At Pontifical University Of The Holy Cross In Rome: Islamic State Not Un-islamic, “model Is Muhammad Himself”
Professor at Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome: Islamic State not un-Islamic, “model is Muhammad himself” Translation via 10news. For more translation, newsletter and support: 10news.dk.Where is the border between Islam...

-
Losing Malmo And Brussels, and Rome, and Amsterdam . . . From Andrew McCarthy at National Review: Do you remember the jihadist terror campaign that ravaged Malmo, Sweden’s third largest city? Do you recall the bombings, the suicide-hijackings,...

- There It Is - Right Out Of The Horses Mouth
From The Gathering Storm The debate is over. All the brewhaha over what to call the enemy in the so-called war on terror - terrorist, jihadists, Islamo-fascists, or whatever the name of the week is, has been settled. As Bush has said, we are fighting...

- Winds Of War: Sorry President Bush – You Still Don’t Get It
From The Gathering Storm The recent statement by President Bush that we are fighting Islamo-fascism has stirred quite a bit of controversy on both sides of the issue when he said: “The recent arrests that our fellow citizens are now learning about...



Green Energy








.