Green Energy


Spencer: Obama Throws Israel to the Dogs

ObamaIsraelDogs.jpg

From Robert Spencer:
It was widely reported Thursday evening that Obama was calling for a return to the 1967 borders, but this is not the case. He actually called for the creation of a “sovereign and contiguous state” for the Palestinian Arabs, and said that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines.” Thus he wasn’t calling for a return to the 1967 lines, but new borders “based on the 1967 lines.”

There were, however, no 1967 lines in which Palestinian Arab territory was contiguous. For the territory of Palestine to be contiguous, that of Israel will have to be substantially reduced. Israel’s 1967 borders were indefensible, and Obama is calling for Israel to be reduced even further so that a contiguous Palestinian state can be established.

What’s more, Obama specified that the new Palestinian state should have “borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt,” while Israel should have “borders with Palestine.” The implication was that Israel, in Obama’s vision, will border on neither Jordan nor Egypt — only on “Palestine.” Yet currently Israel has substantial borders with both Jordan and Egypt. Obama was implying that his contiguous Palestine would comprise not just Gaza and Judea and Samaria, but large expanses of Israeli territory bordering on those two states.

That would leave a truncated, reduced Israeli rump state, reminiscent of the reduced and defenseless Czechoslovakia that remained after Neville Chamberlain fed the Nazi beast at Munich. And if Obama did not mean that the diminished Israel he envisioned would have no territory bordering on Jordan or Egypt, the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state including Gaza and the West Bank would cut Israel in two: Palestine’s contiguous territory would come at the expense of Israel’s.

Whatever Obama meant about Israel’s borders, the establishment of a Palestinian state will come at the expense of Israel’s security. It will not make for peace any more than the withdrawal from Gaza did. In those days the learned analysts were predicting that a withdrawal from Gaza would pacify the Palestinians and normalize their sick society. I said, in contrast, that it would just be another jihad base for more attacks on Israel. That’s what it became. And that’s what a Palestinian state would be also....
There is more.




-
Front Page Mag: The New Arafat Posted by P. David Hornik on May 21st, 2011 The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with...

- Contiguous?
Barack Obama just claimed that the goal of the USA is to have a CONTIGUOUS Palestinian state, and a secure Israel???What kind of geography class did this MORON TAKE?Either Israel will be contiguous or Palestine will be contiguousNOT BOTH...

- Hamas Dissatisfied
Graphic - Israel and the surrounding area: On May 19, 2011, Obama delivered his second outreach speech to the Islamic world. In his speech, Obama proposed that Israel return to pre-1967 borders as a gesture of peace to the Pseudostinians and to further...

- A Palestinian State Would Only Bring The Conflict Closer And Be More Dangerous
Avigdor Lieberman has spoken at a conference warning what a withdrawal to the 1967 or even 1949 borders would bring: (IsraelNN.com) Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in an address at the Saban Forum on Saturday night, warned that a withdrawal to the...

- Hamas Chief Admits That The Term "palestinian People" Is Fraudulent
From Reliapundit at the Astute Bloggers: #3 HAMAS LEADER, MAHMOUD ZAHAR TO THE ECONOMIST: “We [Palestinians] were never an independent state in history,” he notes. “We were part of an Arab state and an Islamic state.” THEY DON'T WANT A RETURN...



Green Energy








.