Green Energy


There is no way ANYONE can spin this as being actually a good thing by looking at the big picture. Like the Repub idiot on Fox right now saying Boehner has reversed the spending ship in the long run.

America does not have time to wait for the long run anymore.

Daily Journal:

How Did $38 Billion in Spending Cuts Turn into Only $352 Million?

Thursday, April 14, 2011 | 12:19 p.m.

As the parties argue over who who won the months-long budget battle that resulted in a deal to cut $38 billion in federal spending, the Congressional Budget Office offered this total buzzkill: the budget cuts were really only worth $352 million. That's less than 1 percent of the touted total; many GOP lawmakers are furious and House Speaker John Boehner may have to count on Democratic votes to get the bill passed. Why did the CBO get such a wildly different number?

First of all, the deal actually increased Pentagon spending by about $8 billion, as the Associated Press's Andrew Taylor explained in an article that was quickly passed around by outraged conservatives Wednesday afternoon. When war spending is considered, the budget actually increases spending by $3.3 billion compared to current levels. As for non-defense spending, much of what was cut comes from grants to state and local governments that haven't gone into effect yet. (Example: The CBO provided another analysis to lawmakers smacking down claims that cutting health care-related bonuses to states would save $5.7 billion. The real amount of savings? About $0.) Other cuts withdrew appropriations outlays from earmarks that were never spent--and might never have been.

One cut that will seriously cut the deficit? Elimination of year-round Pell Grants. That'll save $40 billion over the next 10 years, but just under $1 billion this year.

Politico's David Rogers notes that if you ignore the defense spending, the deal still cuts $42 billion from current levels. Still, the CBO report is a problem for House Speaker John Boehner, Rogers writes. "Given the GOP’s famous '$100 billion cut' rhetoric of the 2010 campaign, the influence of tea party conservatives and projections now of a $1.4 trillion-plus deficit..." The Republican might have to stoop to "borrow[ing] a phrase from Obama and try to sell the deal as an 'investment in the future.'"

But The Weekly Standard's John McCormack urges conservatives to calm down. "Is the CR a sham? Nope, not really." The bottom line is that spending has been cut since Boehner took over. "This is all a little confusing, but the bottom line is that the conservative angst over the CR seems to be much ado about little."





- Right On Schedule
Human Events: Obama wants short-term fix on sequester  President Barack Obama called on Congress to agree to temporary spending cuts to avoid sequestration Tuesday, agreeing that “the full budget may not be finished before March 1.” But much...

-
Washington Times: House GOP revolts against Boehner plan House Republicans do not have enough support to pass their debt-ceiling increase plan on their own, a top conservative said Tuesday as his party’s leaders tried to cobble together a coalition...

- Budget Deal Actually Cut Less Than $15 Billion (???)
Is there really any shock? Where is my Mohawk regalia, I'm headed for Boston Harbor.Poltical Wire:The full extent of the budget deal reached late Friday did not become clear until today “after congressional aides worked all weekend and all day Monday...

-
Just Like I Said ('cept I said it better) Dick Morris: IT’S NO DEAL, IT’S A SELLOUT By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann John Boehner has just given away the Republican victory of 2010 at the bargaining table. Like the proverbial Uncle Sam who always...

- The Chickenshits Caved!
Boehner played chicken and flinched. NO defunding of Planned Parenthood. NO reigning in of the EPA. NO defunding of Obamacare. ONLY $38 billion in cuts. That's equal to the American cost of only 19 days in Libya. $500 billion over ten years. TEN YEARS....



Green Energy








.