2009: The Year "Global Crises" And "Global Solutions" Swept The Globe
Green Energy

2009: The Year "Global Crises" And "Global Solutions" Swept The Globe



All the leaders of the Earth staring into the Glow-Ball Solution.

From the Telegraph:

There is scope for debate – and innumerable newspaper quizzes – about who was the most influential public figure of the year, or which the most significant event. But there can be little doubt which word won the prize for most important adjective. 2009 was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements".

Some of this was sheer hokum: when uttered by Gordon Brown, the word "global", as in "global economic crisis", meant: "It's not my fault".

To the extent that the word had intelligible meaning, it also had political ramifications that were scarcely examined by those who bandied it about with such ponderous self-importance. The mere utterance of it was assumed to sweep away any consideration of what was once assumed to be the most basic principle of modern democracy: that elected national governments are responsible to their own people – that the right to govern derives from the consent of the electorate.

The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of "global agreements" reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion. Except in the United States, where it became a very contentious talking point, the US still holding firmly to the 18th-century idea that power should lie with the will of the people.

Nor was much consideration given to the logical conclusion of all this grandiose talk of global consensus as unquestionably desirable: if there was no popular choice about approving supranational "legally binding agreements", what would happen to dissenters who did not accept their premises (on climate change, for example) when there was no possibility of fleeing to another country in protest?

There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government





- Have Progressives Adopted A Metaphorical Nomenclature As A Communications Strategy?
One begins to wonder if they are talking in a secret code language. Global progressives have highjacked political nomenclature to mean whatever-the-hell they want it to mean. Here in the US, the current occupant of the oval office has clearly stated...

-
CERN Gags Its Scientists From Talking About Discovery Man Was Not Meant To KnowFrom AceNo really. They were doing a test to see what function high energy particles (like, from the sun) might have on cloud formation. I think the theory is that such particles...

- White House: About That Global Warming Thing, Maybe We Oughta Call It A Disruption
 Seriously, dudes, if you're into Obama, tell me, how do you have a "disruption" in weather? Does that mean, like, there was no weather for a little while. Cuz, if so, that must have been a real trip. Sorry I didn't notice it.From Weasel...

-
Top Scientist Warns New Trend Points to Global CoolingFrom Weasel Zippers: (Fox News)- The hottest new trend in climate change may be global cooling, some researchers say. Contrary to the commonly held scientific conclusion that the Earth is getting warmer,...

- Global Warming As A Means Towards World Government
From Gateway Pundit: Al Gore: US Climate Bill Will Help Bring About Global GovernanceSnake oil salesman Al Gore has seen his riches increase from $2 million in 2000 to over $100 million in 2008 pushing his junk science. But, it looks like his real...



Green Energy








.