Green Energy
For anyone who took my advice (why in the world would you?) and kept a wary eye on stories about the military having the authority to round up civilians but not to get overly worried about it -- yet --
it's ok. Start worrying.
from The Atlantic h/t Michael Travis
A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully
By Marc Ambinder
Why is the national security community treating the "Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration's choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Read the bill here, and then read the summarized points after the jump.
According to the summary, the bill sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning.
(There is no distinction between U.S. persons--visa holders or citizens--and non-U.S. persons.)
It would require these "belligerents" to be coded as "high-value detainee[s]" to be held in military custody and interrogated for their intelligence value by a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team established by the president. (The H.I.G., of course, was established to bring a sophisticated interrogation capacity to the federal justice system.)
Any suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents considered a "high-value detainee" shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.
Note that the president himself doesn't get to make the call.
-
Define is. . . The catchphrase is "Does not intend" Especially when the administration wanted it in the first place Politico: Obama signs defense bill -- with objections By: Jennifer Epstein December 31, 2011 04:02 PM EST HONOLULU – President Barack...
-
Washington Times: Senate defies Obama veto threat in terrorist custody vote Defying a veto threat by President Obama, the Senate voted Tuesday to give the U.S. military first crack at holding al Qaeda operatives, even if they are captured in the U.S....
-
I understand why they would do this(the tenants of Gitmo aren't mirandized) and understand what a domestic terrorist is. But do Holder and his goons? Wall Street Journal: Rights Are Curtailed for Terror Suspects By EVAN PEREZ New rules allow investigators...
-
Washington Post: Obama admnistration takes several wrong paths in dealing with terrorism By Michael V. Hayden Sunday, January 31, 2010 In the war on terrorism, this country faces an enemy whose theory of warfare ends the hard-won distinction in modern...
-
Krauthammer on the pantybomber The handling of the Christmas Day bombing suspect: the scandal grows The real scandal surrounding the failed Christmas Day airline bombing was not the fact that a terrorist got on a plane — that can happen to any administration,...
Green Energy
A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully
For anyone who took my advice (why in the world would you?) and kept a wary eye on stories about the military having the authority to round up civilians but not to get overly worried about it -- yet --
it's ok. Start worrying.
from The Atlantic h/t Michael Travis
A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully
By Marc Ambinder
Why is the national security community treating the "Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration's choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Read the bill here, and then read the summarized points after the jump.
According to the summary, the bill sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning.
(There is no distinction between U.S. persons--visa holders or citizens--and non-U.S. persons.)
It would require these "belligerents" to be coded as "high-value detainee[s]" to be held in military custody and interrogated for their intelligence value by a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team established by the president. (The H.I.G., of course, was established to bring a sophisticated interrogation capacity to the federal justice system.)
Any suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents considered a "high-value detainee" shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.
The bill asks the President to determine criteria for designating an individual as a "high-value detainee" if he/she: (1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate. The President must submit the regulations and guidance to the
appropriate committees of Congress no later than 60 days after enactment.
To the extent possible, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must make a preliminary determination whether the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent within 48 hours of taking detainee into custody.
The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must submit its determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General after consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General make a final determination and report the determination to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress. In the case of any disagreement between the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General, the President will make the determination.
Note that the president himself doesn't get to make the call.
-
Define is. . . The catchphrase is "Does not intend" Especially when the administration wanted it in the first place Politico: Obama signs defense bill -- with objections By: Jennifer Epstein December 31, 2011 04:02 PM EST HONOLULU – President Barack...
-
Washington Times: Senate defies Obama veto threat in terrorist custody vote Defying a veto threat by President Obama, the Senate voted Tuesday to give the U.S. military first crack at holding al Qaeda operatives, even if they are captured in the U.S....
-
I understand why they would do this(the tenants of Gitmo aren't mirandized) and understand what a domestic terrorist is. But do Holder and his goons? Wall Street Journal: Rights Are Curtailed for Terror Suspects By EVAN PEREZ New rules allow investigators...
-
Washington Post: Obama admnistration takes several wrong paths in dealing with terrorism By Michael V. Hayden Sunday, January 31, 2010 In the war on terrorism, this country faces an enemy whose theory of warfare ends the hard-won distinction in modern...
-
Krauthammer on the pantybomber The handling of the Christmas Day bombing suspect: the scandal grows The real scandal surrounding the failed Christmas Day airline bombing was not the fact that a terrorist got on a plane — that can happen to any administration,...