Green Energy
Reading our recent article about the laughably, unintentionally-ironically named “Islamic Human Rights Commission” and their legal jihad in the UK got me thinking. (Editor’s note-- Islam gives individuals only one ‘human right’, and that is to be an expendable slave of Allah. Some right, eh?)
Why can’t we infidels use the same tactics against the enemy that the Jihadists are currently using against us? Why must we ceaselessly endure a situation where our own legal system is used as yet another weapon of the Great Islamic Jihad? The jihadists’ use of our own courts in their Holy War on the infidels is deliberate, and is also known as “lawfare”, with groups like the ACLU as their willing and eager accomplices.
I say, let’s turn the tables and use the courts to defend ourselves for a change. And the best defense is usually a good offense.We need lots of attorneys to start filing numerous lawsuits against Muslims. Muslim governments, Muslim “interest groups” like CAIR, Muslim “charities”, religious organizations, Muslim banks, Muslim-owned companies, and so on, are all legitimate targets for our proposed legal counter-jihad.
Now, what should our legal counter-jihad charge the enemy with? Well, the PI team has a few ideas about that. Although the PI blogging team has precious little, if any, actual legal experience, we feel that we do have some good ammo to offer the lawyers. Hence the following…
Read the rest at Pedestrian Infidel
- Tower Hamlets. “it Really Is Britain’s First Islamic Republic”
Eeyore, from the Vlad Tepes Blog, proposes one of the best ideas I have ever heard to come out of the Counter-Jihad Movement: British people should begin to construct or renovate a building and start trials of their federal and more regional politicians...
- Muslim Reps Do Not Tell Truth About Faith
A respondent to an article in the Birmingham News (Alabama) makes some good points: In response to the comments of Ashfaq Taufique in The News October 27, I think that he is cosmeticizing comments about "the faith" of Islam. I do believe that all Muslims...
- Joe Kaufman Needs Your Support
From David Horowitz at Front Page Magazine: Dear Freedom Center Supporter, I have an urgent update for you on the radical Islamic groups who are waging a fight to silence a good friend of the Freedom Center, Joe Kaufmann. Briefly, seven Muslim...
- Storm Track Infiltration: Criminal Jihad Progressing Nicely
What’s one of the best places to recruit future terrorists in the West? Your best bet is to go those who are already resentful of their own country – prison inmates. This knowledge does not go unheeded by the Jihadists. There has been a concerted...
- Storm Track Intimidation: The Litigation Jihad
The bag of non-violent tactics used by the jihadists is deep indeed. Over the last few decades they have perfected a series of effective Jihads against the non-Muslim world while it slumbered in its political correct dream world. There are many Jihads...
Green Energy
An Indictment against Islam
Reading our recent article about the laughably, unintentionally-ironically named “Islamic Human Rights Commission” and their legal jihad in the UK got me thinking. (Editor’s note-- Islam gives individuals only one ‘human right’, and that is to be an expendable slave of Allah. Some right, eh?)
Why can’t we infidels use the same tactics against the enemy that the Jihadists are currently using against us? Why must we ceaselessly endure a situation where our own legal system is used as yet another weapon of the Great Islamic Jihad? The jihadists’ use of our own courts in their Holy War on the infidels is deliberate, and is also known as “lawfare”, with groups like the ACLU as their willing and eager accomplices.
I say, let’s turn the tables and use the courts to defend ourselves for a change. And the best defense is usually a good offense.We need lots of attorneys to start filing numerous lawsuits against Muslims. Muslim governments, Muslim “interest groups” like CAIR, Muslim “charities”, religious organizations, Muslim banks, Muslim-owned companies, and so on, are all legitimate targets for our proposed legal counter-jihad.
Now, what should our legal counter-jihad charge the enemy with? Well, the PI team has a few ideas about that. Although the PI blogging team has precious little, if any, actual legal experience, we feel that we do have some good ammo to offer the lawyers. Hence the following…
Read the rest at Pedestrian Infidel
- Tower Hamlets. “it Really Is Britain’s First Islamic Republic”
Eeyore, from the Vlad Tepes Blog, proposes one of the best ideas I have ever heard to come out of the Counter-Jihad Movement: British people should begin to construct or renovate a building and start trials of their federal and more regional politicians...
- Muslim Reps Do Not Tell Truth About Faith
A respondent to an article in the Birmingham News (Alabama) makes some good points: In response to the comments of Ashfaq Taufique in The News October 27, I think that he is cosmeticizing comments about "the faith" of Islam. I do believe that all Muslims...
- Joe Kaufman Needs Your Support
From David Horowitz at Front Page Magazine: Dear Freedom Center Supporter, I have an urgent update for you on the radical Islamic groups who are waging a fight to silence a good friend of the Freedom Center, Joe Kaufmann. Briefly, seven Muslim...
- Storm Track Infiltration: Criminal Jihad Progressing Nicely
What’s one of the best places to recruit future terrorists in the West? Your best bet is to go those who are already resentful of their own country – prison inmates. This knowledge does not go unheeded by the Jihadists. There has been a concerted...
- Storm Track Intimidation: The Litigation Jihad
The bag of non-violent tactics used by the jihadists is deep indeed. Over the last few decades they have perfected a series of effective Jihads against the non-Muslim world while it slumbered in its political correct dream world. There are many Jihads...