Green Energy
A couple weeks back, I posted a story, entitled, "The Police in Maryland Are Out of Control", which detailed how the Police are attempting to make the case that citizens ought not be allowed to videotape the arrests of other citizens.
I do not like to pick on the police. I admire them, and am grateful that they do the job they do, which requires them to look up the pestilent asshole of the world everyday, and to somehow come back smelling like roses. That's a tough job. I understand.
But, this new movement is anti-Freedom and unConstitutional, in my opinion. And, it could lead to a future police state, wherein the citizens have no recourse to justice.
From the Freeman:
Go read the whole thing.
- Security Removes Muslim Couple For Recording Video Of Stores Inside Mall
CAIR-Fishing Trip Security Removes Muslim Couple for Recording Video of Stores Inside Mall A Muslim couple wearing traditional garb were removed from an Arkansas mall Saturday after several shoppers reported them to authorities for recording without...
- “the Powers Not Delegated To The United States By The Constitution, Nor Prohibited By It To The States, Are Reserved To The States Respectively, Or To The People”
James Madison, James Monroe, A Hamilton, et al States Requiring Fed Enforcement Agencies to Get Warrant to Use STINGRAY Eavesdropping Devices NYT Covert Electronic Surveillance Prompts Calls for TransparencyLaw enforcement officials across the United...
- And Then The Federal Govt Assaulted Me Personally -the Epa
THIS IS LONG SO BEAR WITH ME….. KEEP READING….So I read about the war on coal for years. I thought, ‘gee that’s really too stupid for words, OF COURSE, we can make it cleaner’.I watched WV and eastern KY collapse into what is now utter, and...
-
III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against...
-
Why Photography Bullying is Illegal, and You Don't Have to Take ItWe've previously covered how, despite camera ubiquity, amateur and journalistic reports of police, security guards, and other authority figures of varying legitimacy intimidating...
Green Energy
Are Cameras The New Guns?
A couple weeks back, I posted a story, entitled, "The Police in Maryland Are Out of Control", which detailed how the Police are attempting to make the case that citizens ought not be allowed to videotape the arrests of other citizens.
I do not like to pick on the police. I admire them, and am grateful that they do the job they do, which requires them to look up the pestilent asshole of the world everyday, and to somehow come back smelling like roses. That's a tough job. I understand.
But, this new movement is anti-Freedom and unConstitutional, in my opinion. And, it could lead to a future police state, wherein the citizens have no recourse to justice.
From the Freeman:
In response to a flood of Facebook and YouTube videos that depict police abuse, a new trend in law enforcement is gaining popularity. In at least three states (Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland), it is now illegal to record an on-duty police officer even if the encounter involves you and may be necessary to your defense, and even if the recording is on a public street where no expectation of privacy exists.
The legal justification for arresting the “shooter” rests on existing wiretapping or eavesdropping laws, with statutes against obstructing law enforcement sometimes cited. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland are among the 12 states in which all parties must consent for a recording to be legal unless, as with TV news crews, it is obvious to all that recording is underway. Since the police do not consent, the camera-wielder can be arrested.
Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where “no expectation of privacy exists” (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized.
Massachusetts attorney June Jensen represented Simon Glik who was arrested for such a recording. She explained, “[T]he statute has been misconstrued by Boston police. You could go to the Boston Common and snap pictures and record if you want.”
Legal scholar and professor Jonathan Turley agrees, “The police are basing this claim on a ridiculous reading of the two-party consent surveillance law — requiring all parties to consent to being taped. I have written in the area of surveillance law and can say that this is utter nonsense.”
The courts, however, disagree. A few weeks ago, an Illinois judge rejected a motion to dismiss an eavesdropping charge against Christopher Drew, who recorded his own arrest for selling one-dollar artwork on the streets of Chicago. Although the misdemeanor charges of not having a peddler’s license and peddling in a prohibited area were dropped, Drew is being prosecuted for illegal recording, a Class I felony punishable by 4 to 15 years in prison.
Go read the whole thing.
- Security Removes Muslim Couple For Recording Video Of Stores Inside Mall
CAIR-Fishing Trip Security Removes Muslim Couple for Recording Video of Stores Inside Mall A Muslim couple wearing traditional garb were removed from an Arkansas mall Saturday after several shoppers reported them to authorities for recording without...
- “the Powers Not Delegated To The United States By The Constitution, Nor Prohibited By It To The States, Are Reserved To The States Respectively, Or To The People”
James Madison, James Monroe, A Hamilton, et al States Requiring Fed Enforcement Agencies to Get Warrant to Use STINGRAY Eavesdropping Devices NYT Covert Electronic Surveillance Prompts Calls for TransparencyLaw enforcement officials across the United...
- And Then The Federal Govt Assaulted Me Personally -the Epa
THIS IS LONG SO BEAR WITH ME….. KEEP READING….So I read about the war on coal for years. I thought, ‘gee that’s really too stupid for words, OF COURSE, we can make it cleaner’.I watched WV and eastern KY collapse into what is now utter, and...
-
III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against...
-
Why Photography Bullying is Illegal, and You Don't Have to Take ItWe've previously covered how, despite camera ubiquity, amateur and journalistic reports of police, security guards, and other authority figures of varying legitimacy intimidating...