Eight months ago, Cody Wilson set out to create the world’s first entirely 3D-printable handgun.Here’s a picture of the piece, provided by Forbes.
Now he has.
Early next week, Wilson, a 25-year University of Texas law student and founder of the non-profit group Defense Distributed, plans to release the 3D-printable CAD files for a gun he calls “the Liberator,” pictured in its initial form above. He’s agreed to let me document the process of the gun’s creation, so long as I don’t publish details of its mechanics or its testing until it’s been proven to work reliably and the file has been uploaded to Defense Distributed’s online collection of printable gun blueprints at Defcad.org.
“We want to show this principle: That a handgun is printable,” says Wilson, a 24-year-old second-year law student at the University of Texas. “You don’t need to be able to put 200 rounds through it…It only has to fire once. But even if the design is a little unworkable, it doesn’t matter, as long as it has that guarantee of lethality.”As far as I’m concerned, 3-D printing technology is absolutely awesome. It may be the first step on the road to replicators. The number of up-sides to this are probably too numerous to count.
Here's where it will change society.
Up until the digital revolution, we have had an economy of scarcity as to information and media. But once books, media and anything else that could be digitized - that is, products like books, movies, music, etc, can be changed to information - we move to a period where you can give away a digitized product but still have it. As long as we could turn atoms into electrons, we have had the digital revolution. The digital economy is one of unlimited abundance not scarcity.
But we still have products that are atoms - toasters, hammers, dishes - and of course guns. But now we are on the verge of digitizing those atoms into information and produced by the consumers themselves. The future is more and more atoms digitized as we move to an economy of unlimited abundance.
So what kind of economy is that? How about this from Star Trek IV:
Dr. Gillian Taylor: Don't tell me you don't use money in the 23rd Century.
Kirk: Well, we don't.
… [O]nce this technology becomes more affordable and widespread—and that’s going to happen very, very soon—it’s going to make a lot of existing laws obsolete.
Indeed, there are already attempts to regulate the technology:New York congressman Steve Israel has responded to Defense Distributed’s work by introducing a bill that would renew the Undetectable Firearms Act with new provisions aimed specifically at 3D printed components. In January, personal 3D printing firm Makerbot removed all gun components from Thingiverse, its popular site for hosting users’ printable designs.
All of that opposition has only made Wilson more eager to prove the possibility of a 3D printed firearm. “Everyone talks about the 3D printing revolution. Well, what did you think would happen when everyone has the means of production?”MEANS OF PRODUCTION? Why That's down right Marxist! Maybe we've shortchanged Marx. He might be the best capitalist prognosticator of all time. Wilson asked when we spoke earlier in the week. “I’m interested to see what the potential for this tool really is. Can it print a gun?”
The very nature of the technology would seem to make it next to impossible to regulate.As technology expands in any area of endeavor, things change. As prices drop and availability increases, the idea of some single set of well regulated manufacturers acting as gatekeepers of tools becomes more and more problematic. And now that seems to be happening in the field of manufacturing complex mechanisms. Yet again, people will be asking us… what do we do about this? I have no idea. But that genie is out of the bottle now, folks.