Green Energy
Banks retreating from partnership with Obama administration
From Ed Morrissey at Hot Air:
And after seeing what happened to executives at AIG and other TARP recipients, no one needs to ask why — except apparently for the Washington Post. Thanks to rapid infusions of cash, banks can now take their time unloading mortgage-backed securities and their derivatives, known colloquially as “toxic assets”, without a government partnership. The Obama administration doesn’t sound happy about it:
The rush of capital into the banking industry over the past month is allowing firms to postpone the painful process of selling devalued mortgages and other troubled assets, a step many financial experts still consider necessary to fully revive lending.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Wednesday that it would suspend indefinitely the launch of a program to finance investor purchases of banks’ troubled loans because few companies were interested in selling. A related Treasury Department program to finance purchases of mortgage-related securities remains on the drawing board months after both were announced with fanfare.
The FDIC decision marked a victory for the banking industry, which has argued that such a program would transfer profit from banks to investors at public expense. It also showed the limits of the government’s ability to impose its will on the banks. Regulators generally cannot compel firms to sell assets, and the inflow of private capital has undermined the argument that the banks must take urgent steps to get healthy.
But FDIC Chairman Sheila C. Bair said yesterday that the best course for banks, and for the broader economy, remained a combination of raising new capital and shedding old problems. She said that the FDIC would continue to prepare to help banks sell assets.
Banks learned a lesson from the TARP cramdown, which is that letting government “help” you means that government runs you.
-
Eminent Sense About Tbtf..it Sux
WSJ:Tom Frost: The Big Danger With Big BanksTaxpayer safety nets such as the FDIC should be available only to banks that are in the loan business, not those in the investment business.Once upon a time, banks which took deposits from clients, also known...
-
More Bailout Failure
From Weasel Zippers, citing WSJ:Nearly 100 U.S. banks that got bailout funds from the federal government show signs they are in jeopardy of failing. The total, based on an analysis of third-quarter financial results by The Wall Street Journal, is up from...
-
It's Our Entire Structure And System Which Has Now Become Corrupt - Big Connected Banks Got The Bailouts .. So?
From the University of Michigan's Ross Grad School of Business website: ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Banks with strong political connections were more likely to receive bailout money from the government -- and more of it -- in the past year than...
-
Bank Bailout May Hurt Taxpayers, Be Open To Fraud
By JIM KUHNHENN Associated Press WASHINGTON — Taxpayers are increasingly exposed to losses and the government is more vulnerable to fraud under Obama administration initiatives that have created a federal bank bailout program of “unprecedented scope,”...
-
And Bush Begat Rumsfeld Who Begat Frank, And He Begat Brownie, And Then He Begat Paulson
Tell me is it that no one knows what to do? No one understands how everything fits together? Or is it THESE GUYS who are basically clueless? Sorry, really didn;t mean to acquire toxic banks assets with that 3/4 of a trillion I was talking...
Green Energy