Green Energy

Barack the Ditherer

Gateway Pundit:

Cheney slammed scared waffler Obama yesterday for dithering while American troops are in harm’s way.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney skewered the “scared waffler” Barack Obama during his talk yesterday to the Center for Security Policy.

Real Clear Politics provides the transcript. Here are a few points from this amazing speech:

…In the short of it, President Obama’s cancellation of America’s agreements with
the Polish and Czech governments was a serious blow to the hopes and aspirations
of millions of Europeans. For twenty years, these peoples have done nothing but
strive to move closer to us, and to gain the opportunities and security that America offered. These are faithful friends and NATO allies, and they deserve better. The impact of making two NATO allies walk the plank won’t be felt only in Europe. Our friends throughout the world are watching and wondering whether America will abandon them as well.

Big events turn on the credibility of the United States – doing what we said we would do, and always defending our fundamental security interests. In that category belong the ongoing missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the need to counter the nuclear ambitions of the current regime in Iran.

Candidate Obama declared last year that he would be willing to sit down with Iran’s leader without preconditions. As President, he has committed America to an Iran strategy that seems to treat engagement as an objective rather than a tactic. Time and time again, he has outstretched his hand to the Islamic Republic’s authoritarian leaders, and all the while Iran has continued to provide lethal support to extremists and terrorists who are killing American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Islamic Republic continues to provide support to extremists in Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories. Meanwhile, the regime continues to spin centrifuges and test
missiles. And these are just the activities we know about.

I have long been skeptical of engagement with the current regime in Tehran, but even Iran experts who previously advocated for engagement have changed their tune since he rigged elections this past June and the brutal suppression of Iran’s
democratic protestors. The administration clearly missed an opportunity to stand
with Iran’s democrats, whose popular protests represent the greatest challenge to the Islamic Republic since its founding in 1979. Instead, the President has been largely silent about the violent crackdown on Iran’s protestors, and has moved blindly forward to engage Iran’s authoritarian regime. Unless the Islamic Republic fears real consequences from the United States and the international community, it is hard to see how diplomacy will work.

…President Obama has said he understands the stakes for America. When he announced his new strategy he couched the need to succeed in the starkest possible terms, saying, quote, “If the Afghan government falls to the Taliban – or allows al-Qaeda to go unchallenged – that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can.” End quote.

Five months later, in August of this year, speaking at the VFW, the President made a promise to America’s armed forces. “I will give you a clear mission,” he said, “defined goals, and the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That’s my commitment to you.”

It’s time for President Obama to make good on his promise. The White House must stop dithering while America’s armed forces are in danger.

Make no mistake, signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden our adversaries. Waffling, while our troops on the ground face an emboldened enemy, endangers them and hurts our cause.

Recently, President Obama’s advisors have decided that it’s easier to blame the Bush Administration than support our troops. This weekend they leveled a charge that cannot go unanswered. The President’s chief of staff claimed that the Bush Administration hadn’t asked any tough questions about Afghanistan, and he complained that the Obama Administration had to start from scratch to put together a strategy.

In the fall of 2008, fully aware of the need to meet new challenges being posed by the Taliban, we dug into every aspect of Afghanistan policy, assembling a team that traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan, reviewing options and recommendations, and
briefing President-elect Obama’s team. They asked us not to announce our findings publicly, and we agreed, giving them the benefit of our work and the benefit of the doubt. The new strategy they embraced in March, with a focus on counterinsurgency and an increase in the numbers of troops, bears a striking resemblance to the strategy we passed to them. They made a decision – a good one, I think – and sent a commander into the field to implement it.

Now they seem to be pulling back and blaming others for their failure to implement the strategy they embraced. It’s time for President Obama to do what it takes to win a war he has repeatedly and rightly called a war of necessity…

…There are policy differences, and then there are affronts that have to be answered every time without equivocation, and this is one of them. We cannot protect this country by putting politics over security, and turning the guns on our own guys.

We cannot hope to win a war by talking down our country and those who do its hardest work – the men and women of our military and intelligence services. They are, after all, the true keepers of the flame.

Team Obama’s likely rebuttal: Cheney is unpopular.

- Vote Republican!
In the 2008 Presidential elections, many Republicans refused to vote. They were not happy with the candidates. Essentially said that it would be better to have Obama, then to have a wishy washy Republican. They got their way. Thanks a lot! Apparently,...

- Cheney Says It, Too. . .
Gateway Pundit: Hero Dick Cheney: Obama Giving Aid and Comfort to the Enemy Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 5:12 AM Jim Hoft Hero Dick Cheney slammed the Obama Administration for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.FOX Nation reported on this Politico interview:...

- Sarah Palin (the Anti-obama): "we Must Win In Afghanistan"
From Gateway Pundit: No wonder they hate her. She stands for everything they hate-- freedom, capitalism, faith, life, free markets and strong global leadership. Sarah Palin slammed Obama's weak leadership today on her Facebook page: For two years...

- Iran Sets Preconditions For Us Meeting
Barack Obama may intend to meet with Iran without preconditions (yes, he did say it, no matter how he tries to deny it now), but Iran isn’t granting Obama the same courtesy:Iran’s Vice President Sets Two Preconditions for Talks with US.They’re...

- Obama Would Ignore Un Rules To Negotiate With Ahmadinejad
That's right, Barack Obama will even go over the heads of the vaunted international body of the United Nations. I guess he doesn't feel his policy has to pass "the Global Test." From Amir Taheri: May 21, 2008 -- BUOYED by their modest electoral...

Green Energy