Green Energy
File this one with other recent hijinks like Dealergate.
Don't tell me racism isn't a problem in America. Whether you're the only one who has to work the day after Christmas, can't get off for a serious medical problem when anyone else can for a runny nose (and then you end up in the hospital because of it), the only one who has to work on Inauguration Day when everyone else is given the day off, the bus won't wait for you 5 seconds when they see you running but will pick another lady up in the middle of the street, when you're told you can't wear a McCain shirt while everyone else is wearing Obama shirts to work, get pressured on the bus to change your vote. All this and more.
Happened to my white (GASP!) daughter living and working in a black (GASP! again) area of Philadelphia. And she works for a company that contracts to the V.A.
So don't fucking tell me racism isn't a problem in America. It's alive and thriving in some cities.
The kid lives a few blocks from where this incident took place. Said she also heard about (& may have seen though I don't know that for sure) other similar incidents around the city, though not all with Black Panthers.
h/t Dr. Bulldog
EDITORIAL: Protecting Black Panthers
The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation
Friday, May 29, 2009 – Washington Times
Imagine if Ku Klux Klan members had stood menacingly in military uniforms, with nightsticks, in front of a polling place. Add to it that they had hurled racial threats and insults at voters who tried to enter.
Now suppose that the government, backed by a nationally televised video of the event, had won a court case against the Klansmen except for the perfunctory filing of a single, simple document – but that an incoming Republican administration had moved to voluntarily dismiss the already-won case.
Surely that would have been front-page news, with a number of firings at the Justice Department.
The flip side of this scenario is occurring right now. The culprits weren’t Klansmen; they belonged to the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense. One of the defendants, Jerry Jackson, is an elected member of Philadelphia’s 14th Ward Democratic Committee and was a credentialed poll watcher for Barack Obama and the Democratic Party when the violations occurred. Rather conveniently, the Obama administration has asked that the cases against Mr. Jackson, two other defendants and the party be dropped.
The Voting Rights Act is very clear. It prohibits any “attempt to intimidate, threaten or coerce” any voter or those aiding voters.
The explanation for moving to dismiss the case is shocking. According to the Department of Justice: “These same Defendants have made no appearance and have filed no pleadings with the Court. Nor have they otherwise raised any other defenses to this action. Therefore, the United States has the right … to dismiss voluntarily this action against the Defendants.” In other words, because the defendants haven’t tried to defend themselves, the Justice Department won’t punish them.
By that logic, if a murderer doesn’t respond to the charges, he should be let free. That’s crazy.
The Obama Justice Department did take one action against one of the four defendants: It forbade him from again “displaying a weapon within 100 feet of any open polling location” in Philadelphia. Given that it already was illegal to display a weapon at a polling place and that he was not even enjoined from carrying a weapon at polling places outside of Philadelphia, it is hard to see what this order accomplished.
We asked the Justice Department if it was unable to provide any explanation for dropping the case. Justice press aide Alejandro Miyar merely said: “That is correct.” Multiple times we asked both the department and the White House to comment on charges that the dismissals represented political bias. We received no substantive response.
Hans Von Spakovsky, a legal scholar at the Heritage Foundation and a former commissioner at the Federal Election Commission, tells us, “In my experience, I have never heard of the department refusing to take a default judgment… . If a Republican administration had done this, it would be front-page news and every civil rights group in the country would be screaming about it.”
Consider that the behavior of the defendants was so bad that witness Bartle Bull, a former Robert F. Kennedy organizer who did extensive legal work on behalf of black voters in Mississippi, testified it was “the most blatant form of voter discrimination I have encountered in my life.”
Eric Eversole, a former litigation attorney with the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, told us: “It is truly unprecedented for the Voting Section to voluntarily dismiss a case of such blatant intimidation. The video speaks for itself.”
We couldn’t agree more. After the 2000 Presidential election, Democrats complained about voter intimidation in Florida by pointing to a police car that had been two miles away from a polling place. The police didn’t do anything to anyone, but their presence was deemed sufficient to vaguely intimidate people en route to the polls. In this case, the New Black Panther Party actually blocked access to a poll.
Unlike the Florida incident, this case involving the New Black Panthers screams out for tough justice. Instead, the Obama administration looks the other way. This all but invites racial
violence at future elections.
related:
We Need A Special Prosecutor
To Find Out Why Obama Appointees
At DOJ Dropped the Black Panther Case
- U.s. Commission On Civil Rights Alleges Racially-motivated Coverup Of New Black Panther Case
And, I know it's hard to believe, but it appears it may reach from the DOJ all the way into the White House: Lack of cooperation: The report says the DOJ's "lack of cooperation" raises questions about the government' decision to dismiss...
- Washington Post: Racial Politics Are The Norm Among Many At The Doj
From Hot Air: Remember J. Christian Adams and the New Black Panther Party voting rights case? Thanks to Adams, the DOJ pursued a civil action against two Panther members for intimidating voters outside a polling place in Philly in 2008. The Panthers didn’t...
- Important : Inside The Black Panther Case Anger, Ignorance And Lies - The Dismissal Raises Serious Questions About The Department's Enforcement Neutrality In Upcoming Midterm Elections And The Subsequent 2012 Presidential Election
BUMPED TO THE TOP BY ALWAYS ON WATCH When integrity is violated in free elections, a free society no longer exists. Federal Prosecutor Quits Over Order to Dismiss Black Panther Case From the Washington Times, with thanks to Will: On the day President...
- Critics Blast Holder For Stalling Voting Rights Probe
Newsmax: Monday, 05 Apr 2010 07:46 PM By: David A. Patten The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has given U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder an April 12 deadline to state whether the Justice Department will stop stonewalling an investigation of alleged...
- We Need An Special Prosecutor To Find Out Why Obama Appointees At Doj Dropped The Black Panther Case
From Reliapundit, the Astute Blogger: WASH TIMES: Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating...
Green Energy
Don't Piss Down My Back and Tell Me It's Raining
File this one with other recent hijinks like Dealergate.
Don't tell me racism isn't a problem in America. Whether you're the only one who has to work the day after Christmas, can't get off for a serious medical problem when anyone else can for a runny nose (and then you end up in the hospital because of it), the only one who has to work on Inauguration Day when everyone else is given the day off, the bus won't wait for you 5 seconds when they see you running but will pick another lady up in the middle of the street, when you're told you can't wear a McCain shirt while everyone else is wearing Obama shirts to work, get pressured on the bus to change your vote. All this and more.
Happened to my white (GASP!) daughter living and working in a black (GASP! again) area of Philadelphia. And she works for a company that contracts to the V.A.
So don't fucking tell me racism isn't a problem in America. It's alive and thriving in some cities.
The kid lives a few blocks from where this incident took place. Said she also heard about (& may have seen though I don't know that for sure) other similar incidents around the city, though not all with Black Panthers.
h/t Dr. Bulldog
EDITORIAL: Protecting Black Panthers
The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation
Friday, May 29, 2009 – Washington Times
Imagine if Ku Klux Klan members had stood menacingly in military uniforms, with nightsticks, in front of a polling place. Add to it that they had hurled racial threats and insults at voters who tried to enter.
Now suppose that the government, backed by a nationally televised video of the event, had won a court case against the Klansmen except for the perfunctory filing of a single, simple document – but that an incoming Republican administration had moved to voluntarily dismiss the already-won case.
Surely that would have been front-page news, with a number of firings at the Justice Department.
The flip side of this scenario is occurring right now. The culprits weren’t Klansmen; they belonged to the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense. One of the defendants, Jerry Jackson, is an elected member of Philadelphia’s 14th Ward Democratic Committee and was a credentialed poll watcher for Barack Obama and the Democratic Party when the violations occurred. Rather conveniently, the Obama administration has asked that the cases against Mr. Jackson, two other defendants and the party be dropped.
The Voting Rights Act is very clear. It prohibits any “attempt to intimidate, threaten or coerce” any voter or those aiding voters.
The explanation for moving to dismiss the case is shocking. According to the Department of Justice: “These same Defendants have made no appearance and have filed no pleadings with the Court. Nor have they otherwise raised any other defenses to this action. Therefore, the United States has the right … to dismiss voluntarily this action against the Defendants.” In other words, because the defendants haven’t tried to defend themselves, the Justice Department won’t punish them.
By that logic, if a murderer doesn’t respond to the charges, he should be let free. That’s crazy.
The Obama Justice Department did take one action against one of the four defendants: It forbade him from again “displaying a weapon within 100 feet of any open polling location” in Philadelphia. Given that it already was illegal to display a weapon at a polling place and that he was not even enjoined from carrying a weapon at polling places outside of Philadelphia, it is hard to see what this order accomplished.
We asked the Justice Department if it was unable to provide any explanation for dropping the case. Justice press aide Alejandro Miyar merely said: “That is correct.” Multiple times we asked both the department and the White House to comment on charges that the dismissals represented political bias. We received no substantive response.
Hans Von Spakovsky, a legal scholar at the Heritage Foundation and a former commissioner at the Federal Election Commission, tells us, “In my experience, I have never heard of the department refusing to take a default judgment… . If a Republican administration had done this, it would be front-page news and every civil rights group in the country would be screaming about it.”
Consider that the behavior of the defendants was so bad that witness Bartle Bull, a former Robert F. Kennedy organizer who did extensive legal work on behalf of black voters in Mississippi, testified it was “the most blatant form of voter discrimination I have encountered in my life.”
Eric Eversole, a former litigation attorney with the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, told us: “It is truly unprecedented for the Voting Section to voluntarily dismiss a case of such blatant intimidation. The video speaks for itself.”
We couldn’t agree more. After the 2000 Presidential election, Democrats complained about voter intimidation in Florida by pointing to a police car that had been two miles away from a polling place. The police didn’t do anything to anyone, but their presence was deemed sufficient to vaguely intimidate people en route to the polls. In this case, the New Black Panther Party actually blocked access to a poll.
Unlike the Florida incident, this case involving the New Black Panthers screams out for tough justice. Instead, the Obama administration looks the other way. This all but invites racial
violence at future elections.
related:
We Need A Special Prosecutor
To Find Out Why Obama Appointees
At DOJ Dropped the Black Panther Case
- U.s. Commission On Civil Rights Alleges Racially-motivated Coverup Of New Black Panther Case
And, I know it's hard to believe, but it appears it may reach from the DOJ all the way into the White House: Lack of cooperation: The report says the DOJ's "lack of cooperation" raises questions about the government' decision to dismiss...
- Washington Post: Racial Politics Are The Norm Among Many At The Doj
From Hot Air: Remember J. Christian Adams and the New Black Panther Party voting rights case? Thanks to Adams, the DOJ pursued a civil action against two Panther members for intimidating voters outside a polling place in Philly in 2008. The Panthers didn’t...
- Important : Inside The Black Panther Case Anger, Ignorance And Lies - The Dismissal Raises Serious Questions About The Department's Enforcement Neutrality In Upcoming Midterm Elections And The Subsequent 2012 Presidential Election
BUMPED TO THE TOP BY ALWAYS ON WATCH When integrity is violated in free elections, a free society no longer exists. Federal Prosecutor Quits Over Order to Dismiss Black Panther Case From the Washington Times, with thanks to Will: On the day President...
- Critics Blast Holder For Stalling Voting Rights Probe
Newsmax: Monday, 05 Apr 2010 07:46 PM By: David A. Patten The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has given U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder an April 12 deadline to state whether the Justice Department will stop stonewalling an investigation of alleged...
- We Need An Special Prosecutor To Find Out Why Obama Appointees At Doj Dropped The Black Panther Case
From Reliapundit, the Astute Blogger: WASH TIMES: Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating...