Federal judge orders Murtha to testify in Haditha defamation case
When hysteria over an incident outruns reality ..you know Rep Murtha, sort of like when certain people got al worked up over WMD, you know, those guys you always criticize for it.
From Politico: A federal judge has ordered Rep. Jack Murtha (D-Pa.) to testify in a defamation case related to the deaths of Iraqi civilians in the town of Haditha in 2005, according to the Associated Press.
Murtha, a former Marine. accused Marines of "cold-blooded murder and war crimes'' during the Haditha incident. Frank Wuterich, a Marine sergeant involved in the incident, has sued Murtha for libel and invasion of privacy over his comments.
According to AP, U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer wants Murtha to explain why he made this statement and any documents he has related to the incident.
From the AP: 'You're writing a very wide road for members of Congress to go to their home districts and say anything they choose about private persons and be able to do so without any liability. Are you sure you want to do that?'' Collyer said, adding later, ''How far can a congressman go and still be protected?"
Well that might feel emotionally satisfying, but in fact congressmen are actually indemnified against such suits..I thought while in Congress or the Senate, as in ACTUALLY IN THE BLDG. Which is why you see so many defamatory statements uttered on the steps. But maybe I'm wrong. Politico's blog explains...
Frankly, I don't understand this ruling at all, and I wouldn't be surprised if it is appealed by the Justice Dept. and/or House general counsel's office on behalf of Murtha. Murtha, who can say some inappropriate things once in a while, was clearly acting in his capacity as a lawmaker when he made the comments and is thus protected by the Speech or Debate Clause from any type of prosecution for official acts.
Therefore, this case should have been dismissed, and I hope it will be. It's not that I agree with what Murtha said. I don't know enough about the incident to have an opinion whether Wuterich or the other Marines did anything improper or illegal. But Murtha has a right to say what he did under the Speech or Debate Clause, even if he was wrong about what happened. When we start restricting what members and senators can say in the performance of their jobs, then we are really in trouble as a country.
- It's Ok To Speak The Truth About The Dead
Yesterday, I heard Michael Medved talking about how John Murtha had "served his country admirably." Maybe, in the military. But, after his military service, he betrayed his country in many ways, from his selfish affinity for Pork, to his defeatist triumphalism...
- Murtha Volunteers To Take In Guantanamo Prisoners
This is stupefying. Murtha truly must be insane. I can find no logic in his statements here. I am at a lost to even find a logic of demagoguery here. In other words, I can't think of a single way in which Murtha might think these statements would...
- William Russell: I Am Running For Congress Against John Murtha
William Russell is running for Congress against John Murtha as a Republican in the 12th Congressional District of Pennsylvania in the November 2008 election. He is a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the Army Reserve. After September 11, 2001 he served tours...
- Breaking: Haditha Video Doctored By Investigators
I wouldn't be surprised a bit if the likes of Murtha are behind it. This matter must be investigated and all involved prosecuted. (MewsMax) A video taped from a Scan Eagle unmanned aerial vehicle – purported to show the action that took place in...
- "insurgent Minutemen" Capture 8-year-old Oppressors
That's right. Rep Murtha's "insurgents" and Michael Moore's "Minutemen" have kidnapped the 8-year-old son of a bodyguard of a judge in Saddam Hussein's trial. The 8-year-old boy, Karim Salam, was grabbed Tuesday as he played in front...