Harry Reid admits the entire populace of the nation is being punished by ACA
Green Energy

Harry Reid admits the entire populace of the nation is being punished by ACA


THe House passed a bill to fund the govt and REMOVE any EXCESS subsidy for the high paid staffs AND enforcing that Congress and Senate NOT be exempted from Obamacare.
Reid’s reaction …
“This time the House has attached a poison pill that would punish 16,000 congressional staff,” he said.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/325679-senate-quickly-rejects-house-latest-funding-measure#ixzz2gTEdjX3l
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
So the staff is getting punished by having to live by the same rules as the rest of us? Doesn’t that mean we are all being punished as well?
And then the coup de grace…
“We are not going to mess around with ObamaCare, no matter what they do,” Reid said.

“They should get a life,” he said of House conservatives. “It is the law, declared constitutional. The exchanges are coming on board tomorrow.”
So a look at some other constitutional laws of the land ..
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in the jurisprudence of the United States, upholding the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in public facilities under the doctrine of “separate but equal”.
The decision was handed down by a vote of 7 to 1 with the majority opinion written by Justice Henry Billings Brown and the dissent written by Justice John Marshall Harlan. “Separate but equal” remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until its repudiation in the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education.
The National Prohibition Act, known informally as the Volstead Act, was enacted to carry out the intent of the Eighteenth Amendment, which established prohibition in the United States. The Anti-Saloon League's Wayne Wheelerconceived and drafted the bill, which was named for Andrew Volstead, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who managed the legislation.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether slave or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court,[2][3] and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States.




- Are We Headed For A Constitutional Crisis?
Obama threatens vetoes of bills requiring him to follow the lawPresident Obama is threatening to veto a law that would allow Congress to sue him in federal courts for arbitrarily changing or refusing to enforce federal laws because...

- The "decision" Today In Light Of Others
Context for later this morning..1857Dredd Scott vs Sanford : 7-2 African brought to the USA and held as slaves (or their descendants, whether or not they were slaves) were not protected by the Constitution and were...

- Australian Judge: ''the Whole Basis And Origin Of Honour Killings Is The Notion That A Woman Is The Chattel Or Possession Of A Man … Such A Notion Has No Place In This Country.''
From Atlas Shrugs: If this were happening in America, Hamas-CAIR would insist that the honor murderer's religious rights were violated, and that the NSW Supreme Courtjustice was an islamophobe. The Justice said, "women are...

- We Are All Danes Now!
“Hold your ground, hold your ground. Sons of Gondor, of Rohan, my brothers. I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship,...

- Spare Change?
  It’s no surprise that Hamas considers the cutoff of foreign money to be “blackmail.” After all, that’s what a teenager always considers the threatened withholding of his allowance to be. “Dad! You can’t do that; it’s not fair!”...



Green Energy








.