Hey, RedState, National Review, Charlie, Hayes, Jonah and the rest…
Green Energy

Hey, RedState, National Review, Charlie, Hayes, Jonah and the rest…




image
Having read the LATEST jump in fear, warning and shrieking over Trump in the last 24 hours, we have arrived at the  moment of counterproductive fascist/authoritarian caveats (including an oh so touching crie de coeur from WaPo editors)

Your argument is not with Trump, it’s with the R’s that did not AT LEAST find the IRS in contempt (SEVERAL OPPORTUNITIES com to mind), raising the suspicion the ‘conservatives’ wanted the IRS alive, pour encourager les autres when THEY held the reins.

Your argument is not with Trump, it’s with the results of free trade which PURE conservatives since the 80’s have FAILED to address. BTW, where did all the margin gain go?

Your argument is not with Trump, it’s with a legislative branch so LAZY they turned over THEIR authority LONG AGO to the EPA, BLM, CMS, etc and these people can now SELF-EXTEND their authority. Some of them have their own armed forces to ensure compliance while they do so..

Your argument is not with Trump it’s with a media which has left the IDEA of reporting and arrived at the perpetual commentariat.

Your argument is not with Trump but with an ELECTORATE which put forth a man who believed we need to be liked and tried to do as little as possible.

Your argument is not with Trump but with many govts of a GENERATION that EUCHRED the public over illegal immigration for obvious commercial reasons, until the truth could not be hidden. Not to mention the border is also a national security issue

Your argument is not with Trump but with govt which said 'we can’t really stop this’, and then hit a man who said, ‘NO, WE CAN’

Your argument is not with Trump but with a govt which cannot even RECOGNIZE substantial threats to the safety of the people, and a commentariat which largely will back him in DENIAL

Your argument is not with Trump but with a govt which both cannot control their budget, and cannot find a way to allow the economy to grow outside of part time job growth at crispy creme.

Your argument is not with Trump but with a govt which inculcates the idea of division into the public BEGINNING with voter intimidation in 2008, making its RECOGNITION now in many spheres, by a candidate, in plain English, SPOTLIGHTING THIS, upsetting?

And so we arrive at the man who threatens suit over unfavorable press, the man whose eminent domain ideas frighten grandmothers everywhere, the man who SCARES YOU into continuing all those processes listed above while YOU destroy the Republican party?

You will have to bear this.

Congress and the press will CHEERILY hold him in check, after all, he will be deemed of NO PARTY, and people will resign from the IRS to work for an Open Society welcoming them with glee before they sully themselves with his directives.

I have no idea if he will increase the number of voters and defeat that shrieking harridan, (something Cruz CANNOT DO). I have no idea if this will be a repeat of 1964.

I do ,however, believe we cannot go on like this.

If you choose to have MORE OF THIS that’s your business.

But just as staying out of Syria has led to a series of problems FAR WORSE THAN ANY IMAGINED, what on earth makes you think MORE OF THIS is not worse than 4 years of HIM?
There are LOT, a HUGE MASS, of folks who are not out there wearing white sheets, and practicing our Hitlergruß in the basement waiting for the moment HE arrives.

I am not happy we are STUCK with this situation. I am not certain I will vote for Trump or write in BOKONON, but I am certain what we have cannot go on, and millions and millions of others are READY TO TAKE A CHANCE.

That’s not Trump’s fault.

If what we see from ‘conservatives’ continues and Trump gets creamed, and we get 4 more years of ALL THIS, we will hold YOU responsible, the GOP will be a husk, and all of YOU will be trying to look as progressive as possible on your resumes to the Center for American Progress.





- Mark Levin Doesn't See Through Michelle Fields?
Really? From this source: I’ve backed Cruz, and I’m going to continue to back Cruz, but here’s what I’m going to do. As a result of what the Trump supporters have attempted here, particularly Roger Stone, I am not voting for Donald Trump. Period....

- Cruz And Virginia's Convention Delegates
Cruz wins majority of delegates at Virginia convention Never mind that Trump defeated Cruz two to one in the primary held here in my state. One commenter at the above thread opined as follows: Watch out GOP, you're digging your grave. Maybe you'll...

-
CBS: Why the GOP can't take the nomination from Donald Trump Is it me, or does the argument that the Republican nomination can be taken from Donald Trump at a contested convention make almost no sense? It's not that it would be unfeasible for...

- Trump Believes Abortion Should Be Banned And There "should Be Some Form Of Punishment" For Women Who Have Abortions
This is something I did not know about Trump. He refuses to be clear in this interview with Chris Matthews. So who knows what he really thinks. But it is funny when Matthews feigns moral outrage at Trump's position, only to have Trump turn the tables...

- Moveon Takes Credit For Trump Rally Cancellation? What Do They Think They Accomplished?
This morning upon listening I have no doubt that Chicago police felt they could control the streets outside the U. Illinois event. I have no doubt that Mr. Trump could be protected, although I am certain that the secret service detail was adamant he not...



Green Energy








.