Is Texas in 2013, Mississippi in 1964?
Green Energy

Is Texas in 2013, Mississippi in 1964?


Because THAT was the purpose of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (which had me working registration tables in the south)
Attorney General Eric Holder announced Thursday the Justice Department is opening a new front in the battle for voting rights in response to a Supreme Court ruling that dealt a major setback to voter protections.
HUH?
In a speech to the Urban League in Philadelphia, the attorney general said the Justice Department is asking a federal court in San Antonio to require the state of Texas to obtain approval in advance before putting future voting changes in place.
This requirement to obtain “pre-approval" from either the Justice Department or a federal court before making changes to voting laws is available when intentional voting discrimination is found.
Holder said that based on evidence of intentional racial discrimination presented last year in the redistricting case in Texas, “we believe that the state of Texas should be required to go through a preclearance process whenever it changes its voting laws and practices."
In Texas, there is a history of “pervasive voting-related discrimination against racial minorities," Holder added.
The Supreme Court, on a 5-4 vote, threw out the most powerful part of the landmark Voting Rights Act, the law that became a major turning point in black Americans’ struggle for equal rights and political power.
The ESSENCE of the SCOTUS ruling was that this is NOT the USA of 1964.
But as we have seen, President Obama wants to be BLACK before being President of ALL of the USA (E PLURIBUS UNUM. anyone?) and obviously so does Holder wish to be so identified.
I wonder how many others who worked for EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (in the faces of the KKK) are finding their gag reflex, STIMULATED?
These people are DIVIDERS.




- Meet The Radical Doj Lawyer Suing Florida To Keep Foreigners On Voter Rolls
From PJM: The DOJ filed a complaint against Florida today to stop Florida from removing ineligible non-citizens from the voter rolls.  (Yesterday DOJ, disgracing long-established tradition, leaked this impending news to a sycophantic blogger.)  Florida...

- Washington Post: Racial Politics Are The Norm Among Many At The Doj
From Hot Air: Remember J. Christian Adams and the New Black Panther Party voting rights case? Thanks to Adams, the DOJ pursued a civil action against two Panther members for intimidating voters outside a polling place in Philly in 2008. The Panthers didn’t...

-
American Hero: Coates Negates a Year of Justice Department Spin on New Black Panther Case We no longer must consult history for a lawyer-hero willing to take personal risk for sacred principles such as the rule of law and racial equality. Our age can...

- Important : Inside The Black Panther Case Anger, Ignorance And Lies - The Dismissal Raises Serious Questions About The Department's Enforcement Neutrality In Upcoming Midterm Elections And The Subsequent 2012 Presidential Election
BUMPED TO THE TOP BY ALWAYS ON WATCH When integrity is violated in free elections, a free society no longer exists. Federal Prosecutor Quits Over Order to Dismiss Black Panther Case From the Washington Times, with thanks to Will: On the day President...

- They Are Who We Thought They Were? Obama, Holder And The New Black Panthers
During the voting in Nov 2008 in Phila, several thugs proudly saying they were from the New Black Panthers, intended to intimidate voters from voting, and did so, saying outside the voting venue, "NOW YOU WILL SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE TO BE...



Green Energy








.