Green Energy
Military: Al-Qaida 'Very Capable' of More Attacks
Newsmax:Military: Al-Qaida 'Very Capable' of More AttacksMonday, August 24, 2009 8:35 AM
WASHINGTON -- Al-Qaida remains "very capable" of attacking the United States, the senior U.S. military officer said, as he tried to boost waning U.S. support for the conflict in Afghanistan.
Nearly eight years after the Sept. 11 attacks that killed more than 3,000 people, al-Qaida is "still very capable, very focused on it," Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday.
"They also are able to both train and support and finance, and so that capability is still significant," he said.
Mullen added that the U.S. military is "very focused on making sure that it doesn't happen again," referring to the potential for another such attack on U.S. soil.
Meanwhile, al-Qaida is gaining from the support of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan and Pakistan, making the U.S. fight against extremism in Afghanistan all the more urgent, Mullen said.
The Afghanistan situation "is serious and deteriorating and I've said that over the last couple of years, that the Taliban insurgency has gotten better, more sophisticated," he said.
U.S. support for the war in Afghanistan appears tepid at best. A survey by the Washington Post and ABC News in mid-August suggested 51 percent believe the war is not worth fighting, while 47 percent support it.
"Certainly the numbers are of concern," Mullen said, as Washington ramps up efforts to bolster the size and strength of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
President Barack Obama, who has made the conflict a top priority in his administration and declared the war there a "necessity," has ordered the deployment of 21,000 additional troops, which would boost the total to 68,000 by the end of the year.
The White House also is expecting within two weeks an evaluation by the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who may cut the number of troops in support staff roles to free up soldiers for combat against Taliban insurgents.
McChrystal, who oversees U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, is weighing the step as he carries out an assessment of the war effort amid widespread speculation he is preparing to request more U.S. troops.
Meanwhile, U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan told President Barack Obama's chief envoy to the region that they did not have enough troops to do their job, The New York Times reported.
The commanders spoke during the weekend with Richard Holbrooke, who visited all four regional command centers in Afghanistan in recent days, the Times said.
All four told him that, although the additional U.S. troops have had some benefit in the south, the numbers remain below what commanders need, the report said.
Although the Pentagon has said the official recommendation will not include a request for troops, Washington expects such a request in the coming months.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who recently met with McChrystal in Afghanistan, confirmed that a request would be forthcoming.
"We didn't talk about it in detail. But it's very clear that General McChrysal is going to ask for more troops," he said on CNN's "State of the Union" talk show.
U.S. media have reported that McChrystal is considering three options, including a "high risk" strategy of adding just 15,000 troops to the 68,000 troops that would be on the ground by year's end.
A "medium risk" strategy would add 25,000 troops and a "low risk" option would be to send in 45,000.
Arizona Senator John McCain, Obama's Republican rival for the presidency last year, said his concern was that McChrystal would not produce a recommendation for a discrete number of troops based on needs on the ground.
"I'm not happy with what he's going to do — it will be 'high risk,' 'medium risk,' 'low risk'," the Republican former presidential candidate told ABC news.
"Whenever you do that, they always pick the medium risk," McCain said.
"I think he ought to do what General (David) Petraeus did (in Iraq), and that's decide exactly on the number he needs and then we debate it," he added.
"We need to know exactly what resources he needs," McCain said.
Republican Sen. Richard Lugar, also appearing on "State of the Union," warned that Obama would need offer strong backing for McChrystal's report and requests.
"I think the president really has to face the fact that his own leadership here is critical. He really can't just leave this to the Congress, to General McChrystal, and say, folks, sort of, discuss this after the report comes in."
--AFP
-
34,000 More For Afghanistan
McClatchy: Obama plans to send 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan Jonathan S. Landay, John Walcott and Nancy A. Youssef McClatchy Newspapers last updated: November 24, 2009 07:57:04 AM WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama met Monday evening with his national...
-
Just Imagine If Bush Did It: Afghan-support Units Will Be Replaced By Up To 14,000 'trigger-pullers,' And Noncombat Posts Will Be Contracted Out
Afghan-Support units will be replaced by up to 14,000 'trigger-pullers,' and noncombat posts will be contracted out - allows the U.S. to (say) keep its troop level unchanged(?????) Hey I'm generally in favor of more shooters but these...
-
We Already Walked Away, It Was 1989.
The USSR pulled out. Job done. CIA+Massoud+Pakistan win. SEEYA. 1994 - Taliban appointed by Pakistan, ISI to protect convoys into Afghanistan 1996 - Taliban take over 1998 - Embassies blown up in Dar es Salaam and Kenya by Bin Laden from his...
-
Mcchrystal Wants More Troops
New Strategy in Afghanistan: The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan is preparing a new strategy that calls for major changes in the way U.S. and other NATO troops there operate, a vast increase in the size of Afghan security forces and an intensified...
-
Obama Oks 17,000 More Troops For Afganistan
From the Associated Press: WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama has approved adding about 17,000 U.S. troops for the flagging war in Afghanistan, administration, defense and congressional officials said Tuesday.The Obama administration is expected...
Green Energy