Green Energy
I've been re-reading this middle section of a speech by Donna M. Hughes. She says several things worth thinking about. In this section, she's answering a question she is often asked: Is Christian fundamentalism the same as Islamic fundamentalism? To answer the question fully, she illuminates one of the reasons why feminists in the West ignore the Islamic oppression of women.
At the same time, she draws a distinction between multiculturalism and universalism — a distinction we can use. We experience some resistance from our fellow infidels when we try to educate them about the scope of the Islamic threat. Where does this resistance come from? I believe a great deal of it comes from the lack of this distinction. Once it is clearly understood, the distinction can help us reach (and convince) more people.
Here is the key section of her speech:
I want to talk about why this flawed equivalency between Islamic fundamentalism and Christian fundamentalism has become so popular and why it seems to have become so hard to differentiate between oppressive political systems and practices and democratic political systems and liberal practices.
Today, advocacy for multiculturalism has replaced support for universalism.
Universalism is based on universal principles of human rights, equality, freedom, and democracy, as laid out in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and before that the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. Other democracies have their own constitutions and founding sets of documents.
Today, these visions and commitments to universal equality among people have become secondary to advocacy for multiculturalism.
Embedded in multicultural ideology is cultural relativism, the principle that all cultures are equal, must be respected, and cannot be criticized. Or if one does criticize another culture or religious practice, the speaker must immediately point out deficiencies in other cultures and religious practices, or at least those of his or her own, in this case, the U.S.
One cannot advocate for relative rights and freedoms without rejecting universal principles of freedom and rights. If you unconditionally accept and respect other cultural and religious practices, the first group that always loses is women. Most discriminatory attitudes and practices are based on culture, tradition, and religion. Women’s greatest hope for freedom and rights comes with the promotion of universal principles of freedom and rights; then women can claim their equality.
Today, I see students in class being fearful of discussing types of violence against women or the oppression of women. Although they may be horrified by honor killings or female genital mutilation, they feel they have to accept it because it’s someone else’s culture or religion.
They think it is unacceptable to advocate for other women’s freedom and rights because it might violate the others' cultures or religions, and that would be imposing their view on another culture or religion. While at first glance this may sound respectful, it translated into remaining silent and accepting some of the worst human rights violations against women.
Following acceptance of multiculturalism, they withdraw into isolationism. If we must respect all other cultures and religious practices, then there is nothing to do about violations of women’s rights around the world. They often oppose any efforts to improve the lives of women in other countries. They justify this isolationism by saying they have enough work on women’s issues here at home and they should concentrate on that.
- "honor Diaries" Is A Good Recruiting Tool
Many of us find it difficult to talk to people about Islamic doctrine and Sharia law. Some people resist listening to us or accepting what we say. A new film, first screened last fall at the Chicago International Film Festival — Honor...
-
Phyllis Chesler: Turning a blind eye to Islam’s brutal treatment of womenMy feminist generation believed in universal human rights — one standard for all. I still do. Therefore, I have taken a strong stand against the persecution of immigrant...
- Fighting Terrorism Is Also Fighting For Women's Rights
If you have a pretty strong stomach, watch the video below. And I suggest you watch it soon. You never know how long it will be available to view. The video is about ten minutes long and shows in graphic detail how women are treated when Shari'a law...
- The Mistake Of Cultural Relativism
Maryam Namazie on cultural relativism: Cultural relativism and its more seemingly palatable multiculturalism have lowered standards and redefined values to such depths that not only are all cultures and beliefs deemed equally valid, they seem to have...
- U Or Non-u?
Are you U or non-U? By which I mean, are you a universalist or a relativist? Forget left and right; the defining political divide of the global era is between those who believe that some moral rights and freedoms ought to be universal and those who argue...
Green Energy
MULTICULTURALISM VS. UNIVERSALISM
I've been re-reading this middle section of a speech by Donna M. Hughes. She says several things worth thinking about. In this section, she's answering a question she is often asked: Is Christian fundamentalism the same as Islamic fundamentalism? To answer the question fully, she illuminates one of the reasons why feminists in the West ignore the Islamic oppression of women.At the same time, she draws a distinction between multiculturalism and universalism — a distinction we can use. We experience some resistance from our fellow infidels when we try to educate them about the scope of the Islamic threat. Where does this resistance come from? I believe a great deal of it comes from the lack of this distinction. Once it is clearly understood, the distinction can help us reach (and convince) more people.
Here is the key section of her speech:
I want to talk about why this flawed equivalency between Islamic fundamentalism and Christian fundamentalism has become so popular and why it seems to have become so hard to differentiate between oppressive political systems and practices and democratic political systems and liberal practices.
Today, advocacy for multiculturalism has replaced support for universalism.
Universalism is based on universal principles of human rights, equality, freedom, and democracy, as laid out in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and before that the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. Other democracies have their own constitutions and founding sets of documents.
Today, these visions and commitments to universal equality among people have become secondary to advocacy for multiculturalism.
Embedded in multicultural ideology is cultural relativism, the principle that all cultures are equal, must be respected, and cannot be criticized. Or if one does criticize another culture or religious practice, the speaker must immediately point out deficiencies in other cultures and religious practices, or at least those of his or her own, in this case, the U.S.One cannot advocate for relative rights and freedoms without rejecting universal principles of freedom and rights. If you unconditionally accept and respect other cultural and religious practices, the first group that always loses is women. Most discriminatory attitudes and practices are based on culture, tradition, and religion. Women’s greatest hope for freedom and rights comes with the promotion of universal principles of freedom and rights; then women can claim their equality.
Today, I see students in class being fearful of discussing types of violence against women or the oppression of women. Although they may be horrified by honor killings or female genital mutilation, they feel they have to accept it because it’s someone else’s culture or religion.
They think it is unacceptable to advocate for other women’s freedom and rights because it might violate the others' cultures or religions, and that would be imposing their view on another culture or religion. While at first glance this may sound respectful, it translated into remaining silent and accepting some of the worst human rights violations against women.
Following acceptance of multiculturalism, they withdraw into isolationism. If we must respect all other cultures and religious practices, then there is nothing to do about violations of women’s rights around the world. They often oppose any efforts to improve the lives of women in other countries. They justify this isolationism by saying they have enough work on women’s issues here at home and they should concentrate on that.
Read her whole speech here:
Women's Rights and Political Islam
Women's Rights and Political Islam
- "honor Diaries" Is A Good Recruiting Tool
Many of us find it difficult to talk to people about Islamic doctrine and Sharia law. Some people resist listening to us or accepting what we say. A new film, first screened last fall at the Chicago International Film Festival — Honor...
-
Phyllis Chesler: Turning a blind eye to Islam’s brutal treatment of womenMy feminist generation believed in universal human rights — one standard for all. I still do. Therefore, I have taken a strong stand against the persecution of immigrant...
- Fighting Terrorism Is Also Fighting For Women's Rights
If you have a pretty strong stomach, watch the video below. And I suggest you watch it soon. You never know how long it will be available to view. The video is about ten minutes long and shows in graphic detail how women are treated when Shari'a law...
- The Mistake Of Cultural Relativism
Maryam Namazie on cultural relativism: Cultural relativism and its more seemingly palatable multiculturalism have lowered standards and redefined values to such depths that not only are all cultures and beliefs deemed equally valid, they seem to have...
- U Or Non-u?
Are you U or non-U? By which I mean, are you a universalist or a relativist? Forget left and right; the defining political divide of the global era is between those who believe that some moral rights and freedoms ought to be universal and those who argue...