No, global warming did NOT cause the storms, says one of the Met Office's most senior experts
Green Energy

No, global warming did NOT cause the storms, says one of the Met Office's most senior experts



If the Global Warming people usually made this much sense in their proclamations from on high, I might start to believe in their "science".

From the Daily Mail:
One of the Met Office’s most senior experts yesterday made a dramatic intervention in the climate change debate by insisting there is no link between the storms that have battered Britain and global warming. 
Mat Collins, a Professor in climate systems at Exeter University, said the storms have been driven by the jet stream – the high-speed current of air that girdles the globe – which has been ‘stuck’ further south than usual. 
Professor Collins told The Mail on Sunday: ‘There is no evidence that global warming can cause the jet stream to get stuck in the way it has this winter. If this is due to climate change, it is outside our knowledge.’ 
His statement carries particular significance because he is an internationally acknowledged expert on climate computer models and forecasts, and his university post is jointly funded by the Met Office. 
Prof Collins is also a senior adviser – a ‘co-ordinating lead author’ – for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). His statement appears to contradict Met Office chief scientist Dame Julia Slingo. 
Last weekend, she said ‘all the evidence suggests that climate change has a role to play’ in the storms. Prof Collins made clear that he believes it is likely global warming could lead to higher rainfall totals, because a warmer atmosphere can hold more water. But he said this has nothing to do with the storm conveyor belt. 
He said that when the IPCC was compiling its Fifth Assessment Report on climate change last year, it discussed whether warming might affect the jet stream. 
But, he went on, ‘there was very low confidence that climate change has any effect on the jet stream getting stuck’. In the end, the possibility was not even mentioned in the report.




- The Climate Change Blues: Climate Scientists Suffering From “pre-traumatic Stress Disorder” Because No One Takes Their Predictions Seriously
It Can Get Pretty Lonely Out There On That Iceberg All By Your Lonesome This is what happens when you keep trying to push the same scam for years on end. Two years ago, Camille Parmesan, a professor at Plymouth University and the University of Texas...

- Co-founder Of Weather Channel: Climate Change Proved To Be “nothing But A Big Lie”
From the Express UK: John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible. Instead, what ‘little evidence’ there is for rising global temperatures...

- White House: About That Global Warming Thing, Maybe We Oughta Call It A Disruption
 Seriously, dudes, if you're into Obama, tell me, how do you have a "disruption" in weather? Does that mean, like, there was no weather for a little while. Cuz, if so, that must have been a real trip. Sorry I didn't notice it.From Weasel...

- Breaking: Britain's "met Office" Admits Cru Data Is Bad; Announces It Must Redo 160 Years Of Temperature Data
From Reliapundit the Astute Blogger: The Met Office plans to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by leaked e-mails. The new analysis of the data will...

- A Belief In Man-made Climate Change Is A 'fundamentalist Religion'
So says Prof Ian Plimer, climate change sceptic. In my view his arguments against CO2 being the cause of global warming are the most convincing so far. 1. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has no effect on climate above 50 parts per...



Green Energy








.