Green Energy
Obama Wants To Track Cellphones - Says, Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in their--or at least their cell phones'--whereabouts
We have no reasonable expectation of privacy? WTF?
From CNet:
Even though police are tapping into the locations of mobile phones thousands of times a year, the legal ground rules remain unclear, and federal privacy laws written a generation ago are ambiguous at best. On Friday, the first federal appeals court to consider the topic will hear oral arguments (PDF) in a case that could establish new standards for locating wireless devices.
In that case, the Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in their--or at least their cell phones'--whereabouts. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say that "a customer's Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals to the government its own records" that show where a mobile device placed and received calls.
Fourth Amendment:
- Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.
- The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
That seems pretty clear to me, but then, my brain is not capable of the labyrinthine nuance achieved by the Obama intellect.
-
The Case Made For A Scotus History Making Decision: Fbi Claims No Warrants Needed To Monitor Calls Via Technology
Why does the FBI need the ability to monitor ALL CALLS, ****** JUST IN CASE???? ****** Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, ***PAPERS, AND EFFECTS***, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,...
-
The Slow But Sure Dissolution Of The Fourth Amendment: Heien V. North Carolina
From Aging Rebel: The Supreme Court of the United States chipped another little piece off the Fourth Amendment Monday.The ruling is not as contemptuous of civil liberties as it has been widely reported to be but it did create a curious division between...
-
Just As A Majority Selected More Government In 2008, And 12..
Majority Views NSA Phone Tracking as Acceptable Anti-terror TacticPublic Says Investigate Terrorism, Even If It Intrudes on PrivacyA majority of Americans – 56% – say the National Security Agency’s (NSA) program tracking the telephone records of...
-
The Government Can Use GPS to Track Your MovesFrom Time:Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment...
-
By Illegally Seizing Private Property, Obama Has Violated The Constitution And Committed An Impeachable Offense
Chill, bro. It's all good. From Reliapundit the Astute Blogger: THE US CONSTITUTION: Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,...
Green Energy