Green Energy

'Palestinians': No land exchanges, no interim deals, and nothing without 'Jerusalem' and the 'refugees'

In an opinion piece on the 'Palestinian' Ma'an web site that probably reflects official 'Palestinian' policy, PLC member Mustapha Barghouti rejects any deal without Jerusalem or the 'refugees,' any 'interim' deals and any land exchanges. In other words, Barghouti (who is a cousin of Marwan the Murdering Moron Barghouti) rejects all of the 'compromises' that the Olmert-Livni-Barak-Yishai government has deluded itself into believing make a deal that is acceptable to Israel possible.

In finally talking seriously about a Peace Agreement, Israel may be changing its rhetoric, but not its tactics. Instead of opposing a Palestinian state, it is willing to accept a state; albeit one that does not have sovereignty over its land.

The most recent suggestions for the borders for a Palestinian state show that Israel is willing to remove 3,000 settlers from small outposts on Palestinian land. This will leave 450,000 settlers on the largest settlements that spread over the hills in the central and northern West Bank.

Despite recent reports that Olmert is now willing to divide Jerusalem, everything Olmert and Barak have said so far suggests that they want to transform Jerusalem beyond recognition. The Jerusalem we all know is not the one they have in mind. The Jerusalem of Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the Mount of Olives, Salwan, Al-Issawia, and other parts of the old town, are about to look very much like the neighborhoods that have sprouted all around it: Izariya, Abu Dies and perhaps Beit Hanina.

Every time Palestinian negotiators give an inch, Israel takes a mile; the Oslo Accords are but a case in point.

It is fine to negotiate, but not when negotiations undermine the very basis of international resolutions and norms. UN resolutions - backed by rulings from the International Court of Justice - state that all the land Israel grabbed since the morning of 5 June 1967 are occupied territories. This goes for the old city of Jerusalem and its surroundings, the West Bank, Gaza, the Latrun villages, the Golan, and even the Shebaa Farms.

Egypt insisted on taking back every inch of Sinai, just as Syria is holding out for every inch of the Golan. The Palestinians cannot accept less.

We must insist on Israel's withdrawal from all the occupied land, instead of being talked into a risky land exchange. It is bad enough that Israel took in 1948 half of the land the 1947 UN partition plan gave to the Palestinians. We don't need to make things worse.

There are a lot of lies in what Barghouti says and there is much that can and should be said in response. But right now, that's not the point. The point is that all of the hopes and dreams of Olmert and Livni and their supporters that there is a 'Palestinian' body politic on the other side of the table that is willing to make compromises are just that - hopes and dreams, smoke and mirrors. There is no 'Palestinian' body politic that is willing to compromise. It doesn't exist. And it is unlikely that it ever will.

Cross-posted to Israel Matzav.

- Rockets Rain Into Israel As Obama Meets With His Palestinian Buddies
From Associated Press: RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) - U.S. President Barack Obama is meeting Palestinian officials on the second day of his Mideast tour to emphasize the importance of reaching an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal, a message underscored Thursday...

-
Time's Joe Klein to American Jews: If You Support Netanyahu Right Now You're Un-American Click on the link above to read the whole story at Weasel Zippers. Weasel Zippers comments: The more the left screams these new homes in Jerusalem are illegal...

- Olmert Says Israel Must Give Up Everything; 'palestinians' Say Not Enough
There's a 'legacy interview' with Prime Minister Ehud K. Olmert - who is still Prime Minister until a new government is formed - in Monday's Yediot Aharonot (the Hebrew side of YNet). In the interview, Olmert says that Israel must give...

- The Times Ignores The Elephants In The Room
In an editorial that shows how little it understands of the Middle East, Monday's New York Times once again ignores reality. In the editorial, entitled "Perils of an Israeli Transition," the Times speaks to those it deems possible successors to Prime...

- Divide Jerusalem? Liberalism Bespoils Everything It Touches
Can Israel be saved from itself? I am still trying to figure out the election. But this? Jerusalem? Is nothing sacred to the Israeli leftists? Liberalism, as the US and most countries of the world, bespoils everything it touches. Israel's new government...

Green Energy