Green Energy

PEACE IN OUR TIME

'THIS IS A VERY, VERY BAD DEAL'

A very unusual statement from the Israel prime minister on the eve of a possible nuclear detail between the U.S. and Iran:
"I met Secretary Kerry right before he leaves to Geneva," said Netanyhau. "I reminded him that he said that no deal is better than a bad deal. That the deal that is being discussed in Geneva right now is a bad deal. It’s a very bad deal. Iran is not required to take apart even one centrifuge. But the international community is relieving sanctions on Iran for the first time after many years. Iran gets everything that it wanted at this stage and it pays nothing. And this is when Iran is under severe pressure. I urge Secretary Kerry not to rush to sign, to wait, to reconsider, to get a good deal. But this is a bad deal--a very, very bad deal. It’s the deal of a century for Iran; it’s a very dangerous and bad deal for peace and the international community."
AND THEN, THERE'S THIS:
Iranian state television broadcast simulated missile attack on Israel...

AND:
Obama secretly lifted Iran sanctions months ago...
In other words, Obama is a snake. Is that a surprise?
And remember what I told you yesterday.
UPDATE - A friend of mine sent an email commenting on this subject:
My view is that the left *wants* Iran to be nuclear-armed, as a 'counterweight' to Israel. They want Iran to be a stronger chess-piece. But they just can't admit that for domestic political-viability reasons so they have to pretend to care about all these sanctions, 'deals', and such. At some point Iran will be acknowledged to be a nuclear power and they'll be like 'well, we tried'.
That's just my baseline assumption about what's always going on with Iran. So, I assume that's what's happening here, in particular.
My answer to him:

The idea of thinking of Iran as a rational piece in an international nuclear chess game seems insane, on an apocalyptic level, to me.

I must not be crazy. You know why? Someone asked Obama a few years ago, "What keeps you up at night as President of the USA?"

His answer: "Pakistan."

We've already got one totally insane Islamic regime with nukes. Another only compounds the problem.

- White House Says It's “entirely Likely”, “even Expected” That Iran Will Use Money We Released For Terrorism
From the Free Beacon: White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Thursday it was “entirely likely” and “even expected” that Iran will continue to support terrorism as it receives tens of billions of dollars in sanctions relief through the Iran nuclear...

- Three Things To Know
Pres Hussein Obama May not accept rejection of Iran deal by U.S. Congress --- Best Man at John Kerry's daughter's 2009 wedding? Iran Foreign Minister/nuke negotiator Javad Zarif’s son --- Kerry believes that if U.S. Congress scraps the...

- Netanyahu Defiant In Face Of Isolation After Iran Deal
He's got the right Man on his side: Jerusalem (AFP) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suffered a major defeat in failing to stop a nuclear deal with Iran but he remains as defiant as ever even at the risk of further isolation. While...

- Talks With Iran Now Totally Stalled - No Inspections - All Is Going According To Plan
Obama. From Strategy Page: May 23, 2015: The “peace talks” with Iran remain stalled, this time because Iran refuses to allow inspections of military facilities. The Iranian military leadership considers such inspections a legal excuse to spy...

- John F. Kerry: Netanyahu’s Iran “mythology” Is Not Going To Happen
John Kerry is in so far over his head. I've never seen such a mannequin in such an important position. The Washington Post reported:Attempts by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to secure a more stringent nuclear deal with Iran are “not...

Green Energy