Green Energy
Baron, at Gates of Vienna, has a very important post up today which analyzes John Conyers new piece of proposed legislation which would effectively ban criticism of Islam.
For my part, here's how I like to explain the problem:
Our society is made up of some very powerful institutions. Among these are
1) government
2) media
3) big business
4) religion
Now, we would never think that it would be wise to cut down on free speech which is critical of government, media, or big business. We are all in agreement that to do so would be give those institutions do much unchecked power.
So, why would we, even for a second, consider putting a stop to criticism of religion?
Here's an excerpt from Baron's post:
We have freedom of speech in this country, guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution.We’re free to say anything we like, with notable exceptions carved out after 220 years of jurisprudence — direct incitement to violence and shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theater.
And we are about to add another exception: “hate speech”.
A generation of college students has come to maturity under a regime in which free speech most emphatically does not include the right to say anything that might be construed as hateful towards minorities, women, gays, disabled people, animals, trees, etc.These students are in the revolutionary vanguard of the softened-up, so that by the time Congress slips through a law that actually criminalizes “hate speech”, the constant repetition of the mantra “hate speech is not free speech” will have taken its toll. Everybody will already be used to the idea, will accept it as a given, and, after the required Supreme Court decision, the new, leaner version of the First Amendment will become the law of the land.
If you think I’m being paranoid or overreacting, then you haven’t seen Rep. John Conyers’ proposed kid-gloves-for-the-Koran resolution, H. Res. 288 (the full text is here):
Resolved, That the House of Representatives —
1.
condemns bigotry, acts of violence, and intolerance against any religious group, including our friends, neighbors, and citizens of the Islamic faith;
2.
declares that the civil rights and civil liberties of all individuals, including those of the Islamic faith, should be protected;
3.
recognizes that the Quran, the holy book of Islam, as any other holy book of any religion, should be treated with dignity and respect; and
4.
calls upon local, State, and Federal authorities to work to prevent bias-motivated crimes and acts against all individuals, including those of the Islamic faith.This is pernicious on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to start. It asserts that one person’s right to be respected overrides another person’s right to speak freely. It singles out a single religion, Islam, for special treatment. It accords the holy book of the Muslims more respect than is owed the flag of the United States.This is a CAIR-sponsored Trojan horse, ready to be rolled through the gates into the First Amendment.
Go read the whole thing. It is well worth your time.
We must put a stop to this Resolution.
- Washington Post Lies About Islam
Today, I stumbled across this, originally published on February 3, 2014: COMMENTARY: Blasphemy charges pervert Islam’s teachings ...Regarding free speech, the Quran recognizes and protects free speech and expression in more than 40 instances.... [...]...
-
Terrorism Works: No Freedom of Religion or Speech in the UK In the US when you burn a Quran we beg you not to. In the UK they arrest you. Forget the wisdom of burning Qurans. Free speech is about speech you don't like, not speech that you like....
- Clinton Takes A Stand Against Islamic Censorhip - Denounces Proposed 'defamation Of Religions' Policies
Thanks to Damien for sending this in. MY OPINION ON THIS STORY - IT IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT THE JIG IS UP FOR OBAMA. HILARY KNOWS OBAMA IS GOING DOWN SHE KNOWS WHAT'S WHAT - SHE GETS THE INTELLIGENCE - SHE KNOWS OBAMA IS IGNORNING THE FACTS ON THE GROUND...
- After One Attack Too Many - Proposed Constitutional Admendment
I like this idea. If you like it, put it on your blog and pass it around. This is the future, if you ask me. From Redneck Texan: Proposed Constitutional Amendment Background and justification Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to...
- A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Background and justification to Amendment 28 Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing...
Green Energy
The End Of Free Speech In America?
Baron, at Gates of Vienna, has a very important post up today which analyzes John Conyers new piece of proposed legislation which would effectively ban criticism of Islam.
For my part, here's how I like to explain the problem:
Our society is made up of some very powerful institutions. Among these are
1) government
2) media
3) big business
4) religion
Now, we would never think that it would be wise to cut down on free speech which is critical of government, media, or big business. We are all in agreement that to do so would be give those institutions do much unchecked power.
So, why would we, even for a second, consider putting a stop to criticism of religion?
Here's an excerpt from Baron's post:
We have freedom of speech in this country, guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution.We’re free to say anything we like, with notable exceptions carved out after 220 years of jurisprudence — direct incitement to violence and shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theater.
And we are about to add another exception: “hate speech”.
A generation of college students has come to maturity under a regime in which free speech most emphatically does not include the right to say anything that might be construed as hateful towards minorities, women, gays, disabled people, animals, trees, etc.These students are in the revolutionary vanguard of the softened-up, so that by the time Congress slips through a law that actually criminalizes “hate speech”, the constant repetition of the mantra “hate speech is not free speech” will have taken its toll. Everybody will already be used to the idea, will accept it as a given, and, after the required Supreme Court decision, the new, leaner version of the First Amendment will become the law of the land.
If you think I’m being paranoid or overreacting, then you haven’t seen Rep. John Conyers’ proposed kid-gloves-for-the-Koran resolution, H. Res. 288 (the full text is here):
Resolved, That the House of Representatives —
1.
condemns bigotry, acts of violence, and intolerance against any religious group, including our friends, neighbors, and citizens of the Islamic faith;
2.
declares that the civil rights and civil liberties of all individuals, including those of the Islamic faith, should be protected;
3.
recognizes that the Quran, the holy book of Islam, as any other holy book of any religion, should be treated with dignity and respect; and
4.
calls upon local, State, and Federal authorities to work to prevent bias-motivated crimes and acts against all individuals, including those of the Islamic faith.This is pernicious on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to start. It asserts that one person’s right to be respected overrides another person’s right to speak freely. It singles out a single religion, Islam, for special treatment. It accords the holy book of the Muslims more respect than is owed the flag of the United States.This is a CAIR-sponsored Trojan horse, ready to be rolled through the gates into the First Amendment.
Go read the whole thing. It is well worth your time.
We must put a stop to this Resolution.
- Washington Post Lies About Islam
Today, I stumbled across this, originally published on February 3, 2014: COMMENTARY: Blasphemy charges pervert Islam’s teachings ...Regarding free speech, the Quran recognizes and protects free speech and expression in more than 40 instances.... [...]...
-
Terrorism Works: No Freedom of Religion or Speech in the UK In the US when you burn a Quran we beg you not to. In the UK they arrest you. Forget the wisdom of burning Qurans. Free speech is about speech you don't like, not speech that you like....
- Clinton Takes A Stand Against Islamic Censorhip - Denounces Proposed 'defamation Of Religions' Policies
Thanks to Damien for sending this in. MY OPINION ON THIS STORY - IT IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT THE JIG IS UP FOR OBAMA. HILARY KNOWS OBAMA IS GOING DOWN SHE KNOWS WHAT'S WHAT - SHE GETS THE INTELLIGENCE - SHE KNOWS OBAMA IS IGNORNING THE FACTS ON THE GROUND...
- After One Attack Too Many - Proposed Constitutional Admendment
I like this idea. If you like it, put it on your blog and pass it around. This is the future, if you ask me. From Redneck Texan: Proposed Constitutional Amendment Background and justification Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to...
- A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Background and justification to Amendment 28 Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing...