The NYT **FINALLY** hears some music, unfortunately, it’s Gotterdamerung
On Trade, Angry Voters Have a Point
Were the experts wrong about the benefits of trade for the American economy? The nation’s working class will have another opportunity to demonstrate its political clout Tuesday night, as primary voters go to the polls in Illinois and Ohio, Rust Belt states that have suffered intensely from the loss of good manufacturing jobs. Last week, the insurrection handed Michigan’s Democratic primary to Bernie Sanders while continuing to buoy the insurgent Republican candidacy of Donald Trump. Voters’ anger and frustration, driven in part by relentless globalization and technological change, may not propel either candidate to the presidency. But it is already having a big impact on America’s future, shaking a once-solid consensus that freer trade is, necessarily, a good thing. “The economic populism of the presidential campaign has forced the recognition that expanded trade is a double-edged sword,” wrote Jared Bernstein, former economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. READ IT HERE
In a recent study, three economists — David Autor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, David Dorn at the University of Zurich and Gordon Hanson at the University of California, San Diego — raised a profound challenge to all of us brought up to believe that economies quickly recover from trade shocks. In theory, a developed industrial country like the United States adjusts to import competition by moving workers into more advanced industries that can successfully compete in global markets.
They examined the experience of American workers after China erupted onto world markets some two decades ago. The presumed adjustment, they concluded, never happened. Or at least hasn’t happened yet. Wages remain low and unemployment high in the most affected local job markets. Nationally, there is no sign of offsetting job gains elsewhere in the economy.
Money line in the article:
Global trade offers undeniable benefits. It helped pull hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty
- An Imperfect Messenger Carrying A Vital Message
New York Post: The Post endorses Donald Trump Donald Trump is a rookie candidate — a potential superstar of vast promise, but making rookie mistakes. The nominee Republicans need for the fall campaign is often hard to make out amid his improvisations...
- Labeling Trump As Whatever - Trade Fallacies
Trump is outside label definition because each issue has it’s own solutionSo on trade he is absolutely NOT C On the border he is HARD C On the Military he is C On China he is diamond hard C On Israel he is in Disneyland etc. And this is driving the...
- Gop Nominee Mitt Romney Will Endorse Sen. Marco Rubio - Repub Sources
According to Huffpo The only one of the 3 leading candidates that supports TPP<>Free Trade, emptying the USA of meaningful careers (along with automation, of course) remaining is Rubio. So it certainly makes sense for a Capital Investment guru and...
- Obama Sees Advantages In The Decline Of America As An Economic Power
From the Times of India:...The fact of the matter is that for most of my lifetime and I'll turn 50 next year - the US was such an enormously dominant economic power, we were such a large market, our industry, our technology, our manufacturing was...
