Green Energy
From Mother Jones...
Mocking Republicans over (denying Syrian refuges immigration)—as liberals spent much of yesterday doing on my Twitter stream—seems absurdly out of touch to a lot of people. Not just wingnut tea partiers, either, but plenty of ordinary centrists too. It makes them wonder if Democrats seriously see no problem here. Do they care at all about national security? Are they really that detached from reality?
The liberal response to this should be far more measured. (WC cutting in: Here are your marching orders)We should support tight screening. Never mind that screening is already pretty tight. (Oh Really? Have you spoken to the FBI Director?) We should highlight the fact that we're accepting a pretty modest number of refugees. In general, we should act like (Act like?) this is a legitimate thing to be concerned about and then work from there.
Mocking it is the worst thing we could do. It validates all the worst stereotypes about liberals that we put political correctness ahead of national security. It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong. (Good God! The relativism of the Left on display!)
Ordinary people see the refugees as a common sense thing to be concerned about. We shouldn't respond by essentially calling them idiots. That way lies electoral disaster. (God I hope so. Keep it up treacherous trash)
- Obama Wants To Reduce Screening Time For Syrian “refugees” From 2 Years To 3 Months
Obama hates America, just in case you didn't already know: The Obama administration wants to cut the time refugees must wait for security clearance from the current 18-24 months down to 12 weeks, according to The Washington Free Beacon. This...
- Obama Lectures Europeans To Accept More Migrants After Paris Isis Massacre
In terms of refugees, it is clear that countries like Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, which are already bearing an extraordinary burden should do so alone. At the same time all of our countries have to ensure our security and as president my first priority...
- Europe: 23% Of "migrants" Sympathize Or Have Mixed Feelings About Isis
A poll shows the "refugees", the "migrants (nee the Islamic invasion of Europe) is bringing with it a demon seed from hell: As the United States moves forward in letting 10,000 Syrian refugees into the country, a survey says that 13 percent of the Syrian...
- Investors Business Daily: Muslim Immigration Poses Serious National Security Threat
Investors Business Daily: Muslim Immigration Poses Serious National Security Threat France, Belgium and now even liberal Denmark regret letting in so many immigrants from Muslim countries. Their swelling Islamic communities have become breeding...
- What Liberals (like Myself And Yourself) Should Think About Iran
Submitted for you're approvel. From IraqWarWrong: As liberals, we sometimes have a struggle figuring out how to react to the events of the day (Current events). Should be be for something. Should we be against something. What do dhingers think because...
Green Energy
The Treachery of Liberalism - Straight from the Horses Mouth....
From Mother Jones...
Mocking Republicans over (denying Syrian refuges immigration)—as liberals spent much of yesterday doing on my Twitter stream—seems absurdly out of touch to a lot of people. Not just wingnut tea partiers, either, but plenty of ordinary centrists too. It makes them wonder if Democrats seriously see no problem here. Do they care at all about national security? Are they really that detached from reality?
The liberal response to this should be far more measured. (WC cutting in: Here are your marching orders)We should support tight screening. Never mind that screening is already pretty tight. (Oh Really? Have you spoken to the FBI Director?) We should highlight the fact that we're accepting a pretty modest number of refugees. In general, we should act like (Act like?) this is a legitimate thing to be concerned about and then work from there.
Mocking it is the worst thing we could do. It validates all the worst stereotypes about liberals that we put political correctness ahead of national security. It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong. (Good God! The relativism of the Left on display!)
Ordinary people see the refugees as a common sense thing to be concerned about. We shouldn't respond by essentially calling them idiots. That way lies electoral disaster. (God I hope so. Keep it up treacherous trash)
- Obama Wants To Reduce Screening Time For Syrian “refugees” From 2 Years To 3 Months
Obama hates America, just in case you didn't already know: The Obama administration wants to cut the time refugees must wait for security clearance from the current 18-24 months down to 12 weeks, according to The Washington Free Beacon. This...
- Obama Lectures Europeans To Accept More Migrants After Paris Isis Massacre
In terms of refugees, it is clear that countries like Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, which are already bearing an extraordinary burden should do so alone. At the same time all of our countries have to ensure our security and as president my first priority...
- Europe: 23% Of "migrants" Sympathize Or Have Mixed Feelings About Isis
A poll shows the "refugees", the "migrants (nee the Islamic invasion of Europe) is bringing with it a demon seed from hell: As the United States moves forward in letting 10,000 Syrian refugees into the country, a survey says that 13 percent of the Syrian...
- Investors Business Daily: Muslim Immigration Poses Serious National Security Threat
Investors Business Daily: Muslim Immigration Poses Serious National Security Threat France, Belgium and now even liberal Denmark regret letting in so many immigrants from Muslim countries. Their swelling Islamic communities have become breeding...
- What Liberals (like Myself And Yourself) Should Think About Iran
Submitted for you're approvel. From IraqWarWrong: As liberals, we sometimes have a struggle figuring out how to react to the events of the day (Current events). Should be be for something. Should we be against something. What do dhingers think because...