U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy
Green Energy

U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy


Climate Change (whatever happened to the term "Global Warming"?) is a trojan horse for a Socialist takeover of the world's marketplaces. This has been obvious from the beginning, but it is becoming more and more obvious, because the closer these maniacs get to actually absconding with our money, the more they babble, drool, and threaten.

From Fox News:

A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.

The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.

In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the "Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol." Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.

Getting that deal done has become the United Nations' highest priority, and the Bonn meeting is seen as a critical step along the path to what the U.N. calls an "ambitious and effective international response to climate change," which is intended to culminate at the later gathering in Copenhagen.

Just how ambitious the U.N.'s goals are can be seen, but only dimly, in the note obtained by FOX News, which offers in sparse detail both positive and negative consequences of the tools that industrial nations will most likely use to enforce the greenhouse gas reduction targets.

The paper makes no effort to calculate the magnitude of the costs and disruption involved, but despite the discreet presentation, makes clear that they will reverberate across the entire global economic system.



Go read the whole thing.




- Un Planning Prosecute The U.s. For Crimes Against The Climte, Meanwhile Putin Says Global Warming Is "a Fraud"
From WND: At the upcoming United Nations Climate Summit in Paris, participating nations have prepared a treaty that would create an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” giving Third World countries the power to haul the U.S. into a global...

- Global Warming Is A Scam - Heads Of Ipcc Tell Us, “climate Policy Has Almost Nothing To Do Anymore With Environmental Protection…one Must Say Clearly That We Redistribute The World’s Wealth By Climate Policy"
From Western Journalism: The primary objective behind environmental activism related to anthropogenic global warming (AGW), aka “climate change,” is apparently not climatological, but rather is economic. The revelation came not from “global-warming...

- Collapsing In Chaos
heh. Heritage Foundation: Live at Copenhagen: Great news - Copenhagen is a disaster Posted December 16th, 2009 at 10.51am . The Heritage Foundation’s Steven Groves and Ben Lieberman are live at the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference reporting from...

- Climategate: Barack Obama's Rule By Epa Decree Is A Coup D'etat Against Congress
UPDATE AT BOTTOM OF POST Why is it the British papers seem to understand Obama better than the American rags? From Gerald Warner in the Telegraph: Who needs tanks on the lawn when you have the Environmental Protection Agency? Barack Obama’s use of the...

- Now, The Usa Is Giving Aid To China?
Shouldn't it be the other way around?  From Gateway Pundit: State Department Announces China Will Get US Aid to Fight Non-Existent Global WarmingThe State Department announced on Friday that China will get financial and technological assistance to...



Green Energy








.