Green Energy
The first two posts can be found here and here.
Basically, some men at a chemical plant in St. Louis were exposed to a chemical called Nitroaninline, which has explosive qualities and is extremely toxic. The men became very ill, turned blue and started showing up at two or three different hospitals.
Two of the hospitals went on complete lockdown after the men arrived, because officials at the facilities were afraid the men might have infected everyone in the entire hospital.
Eventually, officials determined the origin of the problem, but would not release the name of the chemical. Later they realeased the name of the chemical.
Note that they still will not give us two vital pieces of information;
1) what are the names of those who were infected?
and
2) why were they in the plant on a non-work day?
There were reports that two of the men had died.
Later, an official at the chemical company made the claim that those report were completely untrue.
St. Louis Today update
SUN AUG 31, 2008:
Wow . . .were there really no deaths from this accident or is this the story to make it all go away?
Ok, but then why is this report coming out in this manner (thanks to our Anonymous friend for making me aware of this):
BND.com has video footage of the clean up.
That statement accounts for five of the eight injured workers. What about the other three?
If there are no dead people, then there are no names to release, right?
AND, THERE'S MORE:
Such flexiblity presents a question of security.
What could this chemical be used for that it warranted an unscheduled order fulfillment on a day no workers were scheduled to be at the warehouse?
Who took the order? Who placed the order? For what purpose?
Who called in the workers, and by what protocol and authority?
Is this how insecure such chemical warehouses are in this country?
There is plenty of reason to be concerned here, even if no terror is related. Identify and interview the workers involved.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE: Anonymous comments:
Upon review of post, number of patients is wrong . . .
re-reading carefully (it's late here on the east coast)
Quote: "One of the eight was released from Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis Sunday evening, while at least four other victims remained hospitalized."
Barnes Jewish Hospital = one of 8 released =1
at least 4 others remain hospitalized = 4
St. Louis Univ. Hospital = 1
St. Anthony's Med Center = 3
These add up to at least nine patients . . .
FBI says 8 . . .
again, nothing adds up.
Hopefully, by tomorrow am we will have better answers.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S STILL MORE:
Only one remains hospitalized
Still no names, no interviews of victims - the msm has lost interest & swept it all under the proverbial rug.
- Victims Shouldn't Be Put Together With Attackers At Hospital
The Hadassah Ein Kerem hospital prides itself on co-existence between Jews and Arabs. And according to this article, an Arabic doctor saved the life of a Jewish 13-year-old, which is very commendable and heroic. However, they've also done something...
- And People Ask Me Why I Carry A Firearm
Because my town, Reading, Pa. is the 41st most dangerous city in America (out of 400 ). Which is an improvement. Last year we were number 37. Yippie kai yea motherfuckers. Want to know where your town ranks? Go here. MSNBC: St. Louis tops list of most...
- Chemical Weapons Off Long Island?
From Tampa Bay Online (with thanks to BabbaZee): BOSTON (AP) -- A fishing boat dredging for clams off New York's Long Island pulled up 10 canisters, including one that broke open and released an unidentified chemical that caused two crew members...
- Our Health-care System And The Nanny State
The essay below relates an aspect of my personal experience in dealing with our health-care system when Mr. AOW had a serious stroke last fall. He remained in medical-care facilities from September 15 to November 25. No doubt about it, when Mr. AOW was...
- What Are Their Names? 2 Deaths In Chemical Incident In St. Louis
UPDATES AT BOTTOM OF POST - I got batted around a little bit last night for jumping to the conclusion that this was a terror-related incident. I don't blame people for saying I'm jumping to conclusions. Because, I am. I have a hair-trigger on...
Green Energy
UPDATE ON THE CHEMICAL POISONING INCIDENT IN ST. LOUIS
The first two posts can be found here and here.
Basically, some men at a chemical plant in St. Louis were exposed to a chemical called Nitroaninline, which has explosive qualities and is extremely toxic. The men became very ill, turned blue and started showing up at two or three different hospitals.
Two of the hospitals went on complete lockdown after the men arrived, because officials at the facilities were afraid the men might have infected everyone in the entire hospital.
Eventually, officials determined the origin of the problem, but would not release the name of the chemical. Later they realeased the name of the chemical.
Note that they still will not give us two vital pieces of information;
1) what are the names of those who were infected?
and
2) why were they in the plant on a non-work day?
There were reports that two of the men had died.
Later, an official at the chemical company made the claim that those report were completely untrue.
St. Louis Today update
SUN AUG 31, 2008:
Employees with Hulcher Services Inc, an environmental cleanup company out
of Memphis vacuum the loading dock at G.S. Robins & Co. Sunday afternoon in
East. St. Louis where a toxic powder mishap Saturday hospitalized several
employees.
"Steve Robins, president of the G.S. Robins & Co., the parent company
Ro-Corp Inc., said the city manager's claim that there had been two deaths was
wrong and no one died. (Laurie Skrivan/P-D)
Wow . . .were there really no deaths from this accident or is this the story to make it all go away?
Ok, but then why is this report coming out in this manner (thanks to our Anonymous friend for making me aware of this):
BND.com has video footage of the clean up.
It also provides this curious FBI accounting/statement which does not
account for all of the victims:FBI Spokesman Price McCarty said a total of eight
people, all Ro-Corp. plant workers, were injured.
One of the eight was released from Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis
Sunday evening, while at least four other victims remained hospitalized.
The victim at St. Louis University Hospital remained in serious condition,
while the conditions of all three victims at St. Anthony’s Medical Center in
south St. Louis County had upgraded from stable to satisfactory, according to a
hospital statement.
That statement accounts for five of the eight injured workers. What about the other three?
If there are no dead people, then there are no names to release, right?
AND, THERE'S MORE:
"Robins said the workers were not scheduled to be
at the facility on Saturday but went in after a customer called in a special
order. He had few details on the accident.
"Despite workers not being scheduled to be at the facility - someone was
available to take a phone order. This individual not only accepted this order,
but managed to find the personnel to fulfill this order on unscheduled time.
Such flexiblity presents a question of security.
What could this chemical be used for that it warranted an unscheduled order fulfillment on a day no workers were scheduled to be at the warehouse?
Who took the order? Who placed the order? For what purpose?
Who called in the workers, and by what protocol and authority?
Is this how insecure such chemical warehouses are in this country?
There is plenty of reason to be concerned here, even if no terror is related. Identify and interview the workers involved.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE: Anonymous comments:
Upon review of post, number of patients is wrong . . .
re-reading carefully (it's late here on the east coast)
Quote: "One of the eight was released from Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis Sunday evening, while at least four other victims remained hospitalized."
Barnes Jewish Hospital = one of 8 released =1
at least 4 others remain hospitalized = 4
St. Louis Univ. Hospital = 1
St. Anthony's Med Center = 3
These add up to at least nine patients . . .
FBI says 8 . . .
again, nothing adds up.
Hopefully, by tomorrow am we will have better answers.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S STILL MORE:
Only one remains hospitalized
Three of the victims were released Monday from SSM DePaul Health Center, a
spokeswoman said. Three others were medically cleared Sunday to go home from St.
Anthony's, while a seventh victim was released by St. Louis' Barnes-Jewish
Hospital, spokeswomen said.
One person remained hospitalized Monday in fair condition at Saint Louis
University Hospital.
Still no names, no interviews of victims - the msm has lost interest & swept it all under the proverbial rug.
- Victims Shouldn't Be Put Together With Attackers At Hospital
The Hadassah Ein Kerem hospital prides itself on co-existence between Jews and Arabs. And according to this article, an Arabic doctor saved the life of a Jewish 13-year-old, which is very commendable and heroic. However, they've also done something...
- And People Ask Me Why I Carry A Firearm
Because my town, Reading, Pa. is the 41st most dangerous city in America (out of 400 ). Which is an improvement. Last year we were number 37. Yippie kai yea motherfuckers. Want to know where your town ranks? Go here. MSNBC: St. Louis tops list of most...
- Chemical Weapons Off Long Island?
From Tampa Bay Online (with thanks to BabbaZee): BOSTON (AP) -- A fishing boat dredging for clams off New York's Long Island pulled up 10 canisters, including one that broke open and released an unidentified chemical that caused two crew members...
- Our Health-care System And The Nanny State
The essay below relates an aspect of my personal experience in dealing with our health-care system when Mr. AOW had a serious stroke last fall. He remained in medical-care facilities from September 15 to November 25. No doubt about it, when Mr. AOW was...
- What Are Their Names? 2 Deaths In Chemical Incident In St. Louis
UPDATES AT BOTTOM OF POST - I got batted around a little bit last night for jumping to the conclusion that this was a terror-related incident. I don't blame people for saying I'm jumping to conclusions. Because, I am. I have a hair-trigger on...