Green Energy
The following is an article by Bill Warner:
A Democratic congressman was at a public meeting that included a military officer. The question was asked: What is the most important function of the military today? The officer replied that fighting Islamic militants was the most important mission. The congressman quickly replied that it was not a problem and besides, we could not fight 1.5 billion Muslims.
The congressman shares a worldview with George Bush. George Bush made a critical mistake after the attack on September 11th; a mistake that created the presidency of Barack Obama. Bush could not name the enemy-political Islam. Then in the Iraq war he was only effective at the military war. Churchill and Roosevelt were great war leaders because they were able to conduct a military war and a propaganda war at the same time. A political leader's task in war is as an ideological leader. The generals cannot do this job.
As a result, Bush won the military war and lost the propaganda war. Those who hated the Iraq war were drawn to Obama. This is how Bush created Obama's success.
Bush is incapable of being an ideological leader. On September 12th he should have declared political Islam to be the enemy of all kafir civilization. In doing so, he would have only repeated what was in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. Instead, his blindness made him create a logical impossibility-a war without an enemy.
Islam is the perfect war machine. It has both a military strategy, found in the Sira and the Hadith, and a brilliant war ideology. This perfect war machine has worked flawlessly for 1400 years and is working brilliantly today. November 4 th was a greater victory for political Islam than September 11th.
But no university teaches anything about Islamic war doctrine. West Point does not teach a single course on Islamic war doctrine or history. West Point's Middle East professors are as dhimmized as Harvard's professors (which is where West Point gets their teachers). Remember that Bush went to exclusive schools and received a good education. As a result he knows nothing about political Islam, any more than any of his classmates do.
Is it impossible to kill 1.5 billion Muslims? It is a military possibility, but kafirs do not have the political will for such a task. Besides, it is not necessary to kill Muslims. You just need to kill Mohammed. In short, we need to launch an ideological war to respond to Islam's jihad doctrine.
And what would an ideological war look like? How about open debate without the usual politically correct, multicultural narrow-mindedness? How about a leader, such as a congressman, being able to speak about Islam's jihad doctrine. (Of course, few of our so-called political leaders would ever speak against a potential voter. A notable exception to this is Sue Myrick of North Carolina who has formed an Anti-Terrorism Caucus.
An ideological war would include our schools, particularly state schools, teaching about the Koran and the Sunna. History courses that would include the Tears of Jihad, the killing of 270 million kafirs. Women's studies that would include Sharia law. Religion courses that would teach the death of Christianity in Turkey, the Middle East and Africa. Military history that would include the great battles of Islam. Courses on slavery that would go beyond the standard-issue West Africa/white man on wooden ships.
An ideological war would include a media that actually used critical reasoning and connected the dots in the Islamic violence that wracks the world with 12,221 attacks since September 11th in 39 countries.
So, we don't need to kill 1.5 billion Muslims, but we do need to kill Mohammed if we are not to go the way of Christianity in Turkey, which is now 99.7% Muslim. We will either fight an ideological war or die as a kafir civilization.
- Statistical Islam
An Anonnymous commenter left this important comment: Bill Warner, at the Center for the Study of Political Islam, has written a pamphlet called "Statistical Islam" (see page 4 of pdf) which reveals 60% of Islamic doctrine (trilogy Hadith, Sira, koran)...
- Jihadists Must See Themselves As Victims
I found the following on Political Islam, the organization who published A Simple Koran. I love this quote: "In short, the poor Muslims were the victims, and the dead kafirs were the oppressors. It has been ever thus for 1400 years." Seeing themselves...
- An Ethical Basis For War Against Political Islam: Part 1
An excellent analysis by Bill Warner from Political Islam on the ethics, the golden rule and the humanitarian perspective which is in stark contrast to the Islamic ideology and belief which posses none such notions – It is important to know how a political...
- Duality And Political Islam
An excellent essay from the New English Review by Bill Warner: Since September 11 we have asked the question: "What is the real Islam?" The answers from Muslims and Westerners are contradictory and make us confused. There is one way to gain clarity...
- The Term "human Being" Has No Meaning In Islam
From Front Page Magazine comes an interview with Bill Warner the head of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (thanks to Religion of Pieces): FP: Why, in your view, is there so much ignorance about the history and doctrine of political Islam in...
Green Energy
You Only Need To Kill One
The following is an article by Bill Warner:A Democratic congressman was at a public meeting that included a military officer. The question was asked: What is the most important function of the military today? The officer replied that fighting Islamic militants was the most important mission. The congressman quickly replied that it was not a problem and besides, we could not fight 1.5 billion Muslims.
The congressman shares a worldview with George Bush. George Bush made a critical mistake after the attack on September 11th; a mistake that created the presidency of Barack Obama. Bush could not name the enemy-political Islam. Then in the Iraq war he was only effective at the military war. Churchill and Roosevelt were great war leaders because they were able to conduct a military war and a propaganda war at the same time. A political leader's task in war is as an ideological leader. The generals cannot do this job.
As a result, Bush won the military war and lost the propaganda war. Those who hated the Iraq war were drawn to Obama. This is how Bush created Obama's success.
Bush is incapable of being an ideological leader. On September 12th he should have declared political Islam to be the enemy of all kafir civilization. In doing so, he would have only repeated what was in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. Instead, his blindness made him create a logical impossibility-a war without an enemy.
Islam is the perfect war machine. It has both a military strategy, found in the Sira and the Hadith, and a brilliant war ideology. This perfect war machine has worked flawlessly for 1400 years and is working brilliantly today. November 4 th was a greater victory for political Islam than September 11th.
But no university teaches anything about Islamic war doctrine. West Point does not teach a single course on Islamic war doctrine or history. West Point's Middle East professors are as dhimmized as Harvard's professors (which is where West Point gets their teachers). Remember that Bush went to exclusive schools and received a good education. As a result he knows nothing about political Islam, any more than any of his classmates do.
Is it impossible to kill 1.5 billion Muslims? It is a military possibility, but kafirs do not have the political will for such a task. Besides, it is not necessary to kill Muslims. You just need to kill Mohammed. In short, we need to launch an ideological war to respond to Islam's jihad doctrine.
And what would an ideological war look like? How about open debate without the usual politically correct, multicultural narrow-mindedness? How about a leader, such as a congressman, being able to speak about Islam's jihad doctrine. (Of course, few of our so-called political leaders would ever speak against a potential voter. A notable exception to this is Sue Myrick of North Carolina who has formed an Anti-Terrorism Caucus.
An ideological war would include our schools, particularly state schools, teaching about the Koran and the Sunna. History courses that would include the Tears of Jihad, the killing of 270 million kafirs. Women's studies that would include Sharia law. Religion courses that would teach the death of Christianity in Turkey, the Middle East and Africa. Military history that would include the great battles of Islam. Courses on slavery that would go beyond the standard-issue West Africa/white man on wooden ships.
An ideological war would include a media that actually used critical reasoning and connected the dots in the Islamic violence that wracks the world with 12,221 attacks since September 11th in 39 countries.
So, we don't need to kill 1.5 billion Muslims, but we do need to kill Mohammed if we are not to go the way of Christianity in Turkey, which is now 99.7% Muslim. We will either fight an ideological war or die as a kafir civilization.
Bill Warner
Permalink http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/you-only-need-to-kill-one/
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.
- Statistical Islam
An Anonnymous commenter left this important comment: Bill Warner, at the Center for the Study of Political Islam, has written a pamphlet called "Statistical Islam" (see page 4 of pdf) which reveals 60% of Islamic doctrine (trilogy Hadith, Sira, koran)...
- Jihadists Must See Themselves As Victims
I found the following on Political Islam, the organization who published A Simple Koran. I love this quote: "In short, the poor Muslims were the victims, and the dead kafirs were the oppressors. It has been ever thus for 1400 years." Seeing themselves...
- An Ethical Basis For War Against Political Islam: Part 1
An excellent analysis by Bill Warner from Political Islam on the ethics, the golden rule and the humanitarian perspective which is in stark contrast to the Islamic ideology and belief which posses none such notions – It is important to know how a political...
- Duality And Political Islam
An excellent essay from the New English Review by Bill Warner: Since September 11 we have asked the question: "What is the real Islam?" The answers from Muslims and Westerners are contradictory and make us confused. There is one way to gain clarity...
- The Term "human Being" Has No Meaning In Islam
From Front Page Magazine comes an interview with Bill Warner the head of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (thanks to Religion of Pieces): FP: Why, in your view, is there so much ignorance about the history and doctrine of political Islam in...