“people have the option to opt out for a pleasurable patdown”
This morning, the federal court ruled that the “naked scans” of air travelers do not violate Americans’ constitutional rights. Privacy rights group EPIC had sued the Department of Homeland Security, alleging violations of innocent passengers’ Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches. The court says that argument doesn’t fly.
In the opinion [pdf] from the D.C. Circuit Court (the Volokh Conspiracy), Judge Douglas Ginsburg writes that the advance imaging technology is not unreasonable given the security concerns on airplanes, and that people have the option to opt out for a pleasurable patdown. The court notes that some “have complained that the resulting patdown was unnecessarily aggressive,” but the judges don’t seem overly concerned about that. Ginsburg writes:
On the other side of the balance, we must acknowledge the steps the TSA has already taken to protect passenger privacy, in particular distorting the image created using AIT and deleting it as soon as the passenger has been cleared. More telling, any passenger may opt-out of AIT screening in favor of a patdown, which allows him to decide which of the two options for detecting a concealed, nonmetallic weapon or explosive is least invasive.
-
To avoid meaningful profiling, the granny-grope and to prevent any more of their agents from enduring a humiliating titty-twist, Nappy and The TSA Porn Kings will now resort to stick figures or something. MSNBC: TSA: New scanner software will protect...
- Supreme Court Closing Iconic "and Justice For All" Front Entrance
... over security concerns. From AP: WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court is closing its iconic front entrance beneath the words "Equal Justice Under Law." Beginning Tuesday, visitors no longer will ascend the wide marble steps to enter the 75-year-old...
- Obama Wants To Track Cellphones - Says, Americans Enjoy No "reasonable Expectation Of Privacy" In Their--or At Least Their Cell Phones'--whereabouts
We have no reasonable expectation of privacy? WTF? From CNet: Even though police are tapping into the locations of mobile phones thousands of times a year, the legal ground rules remain unclear, and federal privacy laws written a generation ago are ambiguous...
- Will Scotus Stand Up For Jefferson, Adams, Madison And Hamilton? Chrysler On Hold
High court justice delays Chrysler sale Associated Press WASHINGTON - Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg yesterday delayed Chrysler's sale of most of its assets to a group...
- Define Reasonable
In summarizing the events that led up to the men's removal from the November 2006 flight from Minnesota to Phoenix, the judge wrote that "it is dubious that these facts would lead a reasonable person to conclude that plaintiffs were about...