“Provide for the Common Defense” is a lot more than F-35′s, VA class subs, and Abrams Tanks
Green Energy

“Provide for the Common Defense” is a lot more than F-35′s, VA class subs, and Abrams Tanks


This week we have been treated to Ivan’s new Satan-2 ICBM (oversold btw) but which is to replace the SS-18′s (COLD WAR VINTAGE - which THEN could drop 10+ warheads inside a football field sized target EASILY), more intercepted nuclear attack drills by his aircraft, China’s continued manufacturing of fortified islands and launching of ship after ship, while modernizing their older ships with brand new weapons, and readying THEIR competitor to our Zumwalt (DD-1000) for completion, while testing AGAIN their hypersonic attack weapons. They have sent to line production the J-20 stealth aircraft (their F-22).  Their DF-21 missiles threaten any US ship within 1000′s of miles of the Chinese theater, as the first ballistic missile usable against moving naval targets.

We are now facing off against BOTH with a targeted nuclear submarine force level set in the 90′s (48) and now realize we can’t replace cold war boats fast enough to FULFILL MISSIONS WE NEED, and CAN’T AFFORD TO UP THE ABILITY TO PRODUCE MORE RAPIDLY.

The Navy’s replacement for the most important part of our nuclear deterrence, our Trident fleet, threatens to take up the ENTIRE Navy shipbuilding budget.

We have aircraft literally wearing out from 13 years of war usage, and are replacing them with FAR SMALLER numbers which we really can't afford to start with, so we are cutting back the number of anti missile interceptor components we are producing (among other ‘minor’ items).

We have the smallest army  since before WW2 and the smallest navy since before WW1.

These are all stories JUST THIS WEEK.

But guess what?

These are all SYMPTOMS, NOT the disease.

THIS IS THE DISEASE.

Manufacturing jobs, then engineering,
then R&D.
We PAID for this situation.




- “since 1999, The Navy Has Not Built A Single Ship With The Ability To Sink An Enemy Ship In Combat By Itself”
Bryan McGrath, HERE In a nutshell, the Navy STILL relies on the Harpoon, a low, slow, cruise missile deployed in the 1980′s (THIRTY FIVE YEARS AGO). When the SUPERB, and DOMINANT Japanese fighter the Zero was deployed, thirty five years before that,...

- Meanwhile- China: Nuclear Submarines Capable Of Widespread Attack On U.s.
Wash Times:Chinese state-run media revealed for the first time this week that Beijing’s nuclear submarines can attack American cities as a means to counterbalance U.S. nuclear deterrence in the Pacific.On Monday, leading media outlets including China...

- And Not For Las Vegas Use, Either
Unfortunately, boys, it might also take out the some of the carriers and frigates and destroyers capabilities from the US bringing help (assuming Obama is out of office), as well as all US planes, and missiles in the air.Taiwan developing non-nuclear...

- While Gaza Is Hammered And The Naacp Complains About Ole South Gowns In The Inaugural, Strategic Challenges Loom
During Reagan's presidency the US Navy numbered almost 600 ships, with 11 or more carrier task groups. Today we have less than half that. By 2015 China's submarine fleet ALONE will outnumber ours. Their navy will have 600 ships, and...

- While We Duke It Out Over Ayers, Acorn, Wallace And Fannie Mae - U.s. Report: Russia Has Upgraded Strategic Nuclear Forces
In the last few years: Using profits from oil and natural gas resources, Russia is building up its strategic nuclear forces, including several new missiles and delivery systems. They include: a new road-mobile and silo-based Topol-M (SS-27)...



Green Energy








.