KABUL, Afghanistan — With the surge of American troops over and the Taliban still a potent threat, American generals and civilian officials acknowledge that they have all but written off what was once one of the cornerstones of their strategy to end the war here: battering the Taliban into a peace deal.
Green Energy
New York Times:
U.S. Abandoning Hopes for Taliban Peace Deal
-
Pres Obama wants to swap Gitmo prisoners with Taliban before Afghan exit.....As MB 'Godfather' Qaradawi 'arranged' in 2011 From Will at THE OTHER NEWS: Pres Obama wants to swap Gitmo prisoners with Taliban before Afghan exit.....As MB...
-
Taliban will serve in Afghan army BRITISH TROOPS WILL NOT LEAVE AFGHANISTAN UNTIL 2020 From Will at THE OTHER NEWS: British troops won't leave Afghanistan until the end of the decade, Taliban will serve in Afghan army.(DM). •Senior official says...
- If This Story Is True, Barack Obama Is A Danger To The Republic
As US Forces are filmed being attacked by the Taliban, ambushed by the Taliban and then seen all over the USA, and those of us old enough to have clear memories of Henry Kissinger’s negotiations from 1972 onwards, and REMEMBER how ANY negotiations...
-
Breitbart: US confirms 'outreach' to Taliban Defense Secretary Robert Gates confirmed that US officials were involved in preliminary talks with the Taliban to seek a political solution to the Afghan war but said he didn't expect significant...
- Taliban's Counter Strategy Is Based On Declared Us Strategy
Walid Phares at Counterterrorismblog: Now that we know the administration’s new strategy for Afghanistan, what is the Taliban strategy against the United States? Such a question is warranted to be able to project the clash between the two strategies...
Green Energy
New York Times:
U.S. Abandoning Hopes for Taliban Peace Deal
The once ambitious American plans for ending the war are now being replaced by the far more modest goal of setting the stage for the Afghans to work out a deal among themselves in the years after most Western forces depart, and to ensure Pakistan is on board with any eventual settlement. Military and diplomatic officials here and in Washington said that despite attempts to engage directly with Taliban leaders this year, they now expect that any significant progress will come only after 2014, once the bulk of NATO troops have left.
“I don’t see it happening in the next couple years,” said a senior coalition officer. He and a number of other officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the effort to open talks.
“It’s a very resilient enemy, and I’m not going to tell you it’s not,” the officer said. “It will be a constant battle, and it will be for years.”
The failure to broker meaningful talks with the Taliban underscores the fragility of the gains claimed during the surge of American troops ordered by President Obama in 2009. The 30,000 extra troops won back territory held by the Taliban, but by nearly all estimates failed to deal a crippling blow.
Critics of the Obama administration say the United States also weakened its own hand by agreeing to the 2014 deadline for its own involvement in combat operations, voluntarily ceding the prize the Taliban has been seeking for over a decade. The Obama administration defends the deadline as crucial to persuading the Afghan government and military to assume full responsibility for the country, and politically necessary for Americans weary of what has already become the country’s longest war.
Among America’s commanding generals here, from Stanley A. McChrystal and David H. Petraeus to today’s John R. Allen, it has been an oft-repeated mantra that the United States is not going to kill its way out of Afghanistan. They said that the Afghanistan war, like most insurgencies, could only end with a negotiation.
Now American officials say they have reduced their goals further — to patiently laying the groundwork for eventual peace talks after they leave. American officials say they hope that the Taliban will find the Afghan Army a more formidable adversary than they expect and be compelled, in the years after NATO withdraws, to come to terms with what they now dismiss as a “puppet” government.
The United States has not given up on talks before that time. It agreed last month to set up a committee with Pakistan that would vet potential new Taliban interlocutors, and the Obama administration is considering whether to revive a proposed prisoner swap with the insurgents that would, officials hope, reopen preliminary discussions that collapsed in March, current and former American officials said. Those are both seen as long-term efforts, however.
With the end of this year’s fighting season, the Taliban have weathered the biggest push the American-led coalition is going to make against them. A third of all American forces left by this month, and more of the 68,000 remaining may leave next year, with the goal that only a residual force of trainers and special operations troops will remain by the end of 2014.
Bringing Pakistan into the search for Taliban contacts is also an uncertain strategy, American officials said. The details of the new vetting committee have yet to be worked out, and “if we are depending on Pakistan, it comes with an asterisk,” one of the officials said. “We never know whether they will see it through.”
The American shift toward a more peripheral role in peace efforts represents another retreat from Washington’s once broad designs for Afghanistan, where the surge, along with a sharp escalation of nighttime raids by Special Operations Forces against Taliban field commanders, were partly aimed at forcing the Taliban into negotiations, making a Western withdrawal more feasible.
For a brief moment, the strategy appeared to be working: preliminary talks, painstakingly set up throughout 2011, opened early this year in Qatar, in the Persian Gulf.
the rest here
-
Pres Obama wants to swap Gitmo prisoners with Taliban before Afghan exit.....As MB 'Godfather' Qaradawi 'arranged' in 2011 From Will at THE OTHER NEWS: Pres Obama wants to swap Gitmo prisoners with Taliban before Afghan exit.....As MB...
-
Taliban will serve in Afghan army BRITISH TROOPS WILL NOT LEAVE AFGHANISTAN UNTIL 2020 From Will at THE OTHER NEWS: British troops won't leave Afghanistan until the end of the decade, Taliban will serve in Afghan army.(DM). •Senior official says...
- If This Story Is True, Barack Obama Is A Danger To The Republic
As US Forces are filmed being attacked by the Taliban, ambushed by the Taliban and then seen all over the USA, and those of us old enough to have clear memories of Henry Kissinger’s negotiations from 1972 onwards, and REMEMBER how ANY negotiations...
-
Breitbart: US confirms 'outreach' to Taliban Defense Secretary Robert Gates confirmed that US officials were involved in preliminary talks with the Taliban to seek a political solution to the Afghan war but said he didn't expect significant...
- Taliban's Counter Strategy Is Based On Declared Us Strategy
Walid Phares at Counterterrorismblog: Now that we know the administration’s new strategy for Afghanistan, what is the Taliban strategy against the United States? Such a question is warranted to be able to project the clash between the two strategies...