Green Energy
- “isis Is More Powerful Now Than Al Qaeda Was On 9/11”
Congressman Peter King, yesterday. King formerly served as the Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, where he drew attention in early 2011 for holding hearings on the extent of radicalization of Muslim Americans. He also...
-
Muslim Testifies Against Islamism to Congress From Rusty at Jawa: I missed Rep. King's hearing this morning on homegrown radicalism. If any one sees the footage up at YouTube or elsewhere, do me a favor and drop a line. Here is the text...
- Peter King's Hearings Fell Predictably Short
Investor's Business Daily is right, the Congressional hearings on Islamofascism held by Rep. Peter King fall way short of the mark, because he otherwise refused to bring in the real experts: Reviews of Rep. Pete King’s opening round of hearings...
-
Fox: King Launches Hearing on Radical Islam, Says Lawmakers Cannot Live 'in Denial' Rep. Peter King vowed to make Thursday's congressional hearing on Islamic radicalization the first in a series, as he launched the high-profile inquiry amid...
-
CBS: In Wake Of Muslim Hearings, Rep. King Gets Security Upgrade L.I. Congressman Says Hostile Phone Calls Flooding His Office March 7, 2011 11:00 PM NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Long Island Congressman Peter King is facing threats — and getting extra...
Green Energy
At Islamic radicalization hearings, moderate Muslims warn Congress while Dems question their very participation
Steve Emerson, at Jewish World Review:
The fifth House Homeland Security Committee hearing on radicalization within the Muslim community ended Wednesday much as last year's inaugural hearing began: With committee Democrats criticizing the premise and diminishing the views of witnesses.
The hearing, "The American Muslim Response to Hearings on Radicalization within their Community," featured three Muslim American activists describing their first-hand experiences identifying and challenging extremist viewpoints and visceral reaction that often generates.Those accounts were largely dismissed, however, as representatives stuck to talking points about the horrible harm they saw being caused by the very discussion. Ranking Democrat Bennie Thompson of Mississippi worried the hearings helped "provide a Congressional stamp of approval for groups that espouse anti-Muslim beliefs" and fuel anti-Muslim hate crimes.None of the critics offered an example of any crime which was in any way connected to the congressional hearings.Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., invoked the Japanese internment camps during World War II.That left Chairman Peter King, R-N.Y., frustrated. He cited a statement by Attorney General Eric Holder that there was a crisis of radicalization to violence within the Muslim-American community. Past testimony showed "[t]he threat posed by radicalized Muslim-Americans is a clear and present danger to homeland security," he said in his prepared remarks. Widely accessible videos and books in prison libraries fuel the radicalization, he noted. And classified information shows a growing problem of Islamist extremism within U.S. military ranks has reached a "truly eye-popping amount of ongoing cases."From Pamela at Atlas Shrrugs: National Islamist [sic] organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations tracked the hearing with chapter leaders posting a stream of criticism on Twitter. "No such thing as Islamism," Michigan Director Dawud Walid claimed. "Is there Christianism or Jewishism?"Yet, the discussion remained blocked by partisanship.That's by design, witnesses said."If you label anybody that addresses this [as] an Islamophobe or a bigot, it stifles free speech," said ZuhdiJasser, founder of theAmerican-Islamic Forum for Democracy and a member of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. "It prevents us from dealing with the very issue that we need to."He said he hoped the hearings could serve as "a dialogue to bridge between those who see no problem in the Muslim community and those who see all Muslims as a problem."For all the talk of fueling anti-Muslim sentiment, the hearings provide a chance to explain the distinction between the faith of Islam and the politics of Islamism, said Qanta Ahmed, a writer and physician who treats 9/11 first responders.One is a faith, she said. The other is political ideology. For all the rhetoric, nothing debated in the radicalization hearings has crimped her ability to practice her religion. "I am more free to worship here than in any Muslim majority nation," she said. "Our rights are not at risk. That gets lost in the debate."King echoed that, saying "none of the nightmare scenarios anticipated by the media ever occurred. No religious war broke out. Not one bigoted word was uttered during the four investigative hearings we held."There is a cultural element in play, said former Wall Street Journal reporter AsraNomani. Many Muslims have become what she called "wound collectors," citing a phrase created by an FBI agent. They cling to ancient grievances, dating back to the Crusades, and quickly turn defensive and in denial to any outside criticism.The Quran calls on people to stand for justice, she said, even if it's within your own community. That's often easier said than done, and for Muslims like herself it creates "a culture clash where you can't talk to each other."National Islamist organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations tracked the hearing with chapter leaders posting a stream of criticism on Twitter. "No such thing as Islamism," Michigan Director Dawud Walid claimed. "Is there Christianism or Jewishism?"The term is not an invention by non-Muslims, though. The Muslim Brotherhood uses it, and this website is devoted to it.In the inaugural hearing last year, California Democrat Jackie Speier denigrated the panelists' experiences, calling them anecdotes that offered little from which to learn. Rep. Laura Richardson, D-Calif., picked up that theme Wednesday, comparing the witness testimony to an episode of "Oprah."Future hearings need more authoritative witnesses, she said, or else it's "similar to a community town hall that does not rise to the level of U.S. Congress."King angrily rebutted that, noting the committee often presents classified briefings to its members.Faiza Patel, co-director of New York University Law School's Liberty and National Security Program, stressed her view that signs of stricter religious practices among Muslims were not signs of a trend toward violent radicalization. She rejected the notion offered by some in law enforcement of a "conveyor belt" of radicalization, saying it does nothing to help identify those with potential to engage in terrorism.
- “isis Is More Powerful Now Than Al Qaeda Was On 9/11”
Congressman Peter King, yesterday. King formerly served as the Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, where he drew attention in early 2011 for holding hearings on the extent of radicalization of Muslim Americans. He also...
-
Muslim Testifies Against Islamism to Congress From Rusty at Jawa: I missed Rep. King's hearing this morning on homegrown radicalism. If any one sees the footage up at YouTube or elsewhere, do me a favor and drop a line. Here is the text...
- Peter King's Hearings Fell Predictably Short
Investor's Business Daily is right, the Congressional hearings on Islamofascism held by Rep. Peter King fall way short of the mark, because he otherwise refused to bring in the real experts: Reviews of Rep. Pete King’s opening round of hearings...
-
Fox: King Launches Hearing on Radical Islam, Says Lawmakers Cannot Live 'in Denial' Rep. Peter King vowed to make Thursday's congressional hearing on Islamic radicalization the first in a series, as he launched the high-profile inquiry amid...
-
CBS: In Wake Of Muslim Hearings, Rep. King Gets Security Upgrade L.I. Congressman Says Hostile Phone Calls Flooding His Office March 7, 2011 11:00 PM NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Long Island Congressman Peter King is facing threats — and getting extra...