"We Manage Our Capital In Its Aggregate" - Banks Refuse To Say What They've Done With Bailout Money
WASHINGTON – It's something any bank would demand to know before handing out a loan: Where's the money going?
But after receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it.
"We've lent some of it. We've not lent some of it. We've not given any accounting of, 'Here's how we're doing it,'" said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money. "We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to."
The Associated Press contacted 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in government money and asked four questions: How much has been spent? What was it spent on? How much is being held in savings, and what's the plan for the rest?
None of the banks provided specific answers.
"We're not providing dollar-in, dollar-out tracking," said Barry Koling, a spokesman for Atlanta, Ga.-based SunTrust Banks Inc., which got $3.5 billion in taxpayer dollars.
Some banks said they simply didn't know where the money was going.
"We manage our capital in its aggregate," said Regions Financial Corp. spokesman Tim Deighton, who said the Birmingham, Ala.-based company is not tracking how it is spending the $3.5 billion it received as part of the financial bailout.
The answers highlight the secrecy surrounding the Troubled Assets Relief Program, which earmarked $700 billion — about the size of the Netherlands' economy — to help rescue the financial industry. TheTreasury Department has been using the money to buy stock in U.S. banks, hoping that the sudden inflow of cash will get banks to startlending money.
There has been no accounting of how banks spend that money.
Lawmakers summoned bank executives to Capitol Hill last month and implored them to lend the money — not to hoard it or spend it on corporate bonuses, junkets or to buy other banks.
But there is no process in place to make sure that's happening and there are no consequences for banks who don't comply.
- Eminent Sense About Tbtf..it Sux
WSJ:Tom Frost: The Big Danger With Big BanksTaxpayer safety nets such as the FDIC should be available only to banks that are in the loan business, not those in the investment business.Once upon a time, banks which took deposits from clients, also known...
- It's Our Entire Structure And System Which Has Now Become Corrupt - Big Connected Banks Got The Bailouts .. So?
From the University of Michigan's Ross Grad School of Business website: ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Banks with strong political connections were more likely to receive bailout money from the government -- and more of it -- in the past year than...
- Banks Retreating From Partnership With Obama Administration
From Ed Morrissey at Hot Air: And after seeing what happened to executives at AIG and other TARP recipients, no one needs to ask why — except apparently for the Washington Post. Thanks to rapid infusions of cash, banks can now take their time unloading...
- Bank Bailout May Hurt Taxpayers, Be Open To Fraud
By JIM KUHNHENN Associated Press WASHINGTON — Taxpayers are increasingly exposed to losses and the government is more vulnerable to fraud under Obama administration initiatives that have created a federal bank bailout program of “unprecedented scope,”...
- Obama Wants To Control The Banks
There's a reason he refuses to accept repayment of TARP money. From the Wall Street Journal: I must be naive. I really thought the administration would welcome the return of bank bailout money. Some $340 million in TARP cash flowed back this week...