Green Energy
Pastorius states below we are fools if we ever forget 9/11. And he is very correct. None of us here have.
Our Appeaser in Chief, however. . .
from the Times Online via Gateway Pundit
Obama puts brake on Afghan surge
PRESIDENT Barack Obama has demanded that American defence chiefs review their strategy in Afghanistan before going ahead with a troop surge.
There is concern among senior Democrats that the military is preparing to send up to 30,000 extra troops without a coherent plan or exit strategy.
The Pentagon was set to announce the deployment of 17,000 extra soldiers and marines last week but Robert Gates, the defence secretary, postponed the decision after questions from Obama.
The president was concerned by a lack of strategy at his first meeting with Gates and the US joint chiefs of staff last month in “the tank”, the secure conference room in the Pentagon. He asked: “What’s the endgame?” and did not receive a convincing answer.
Larry Korb, a defence expert at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank, said: “Obama is exactly right. Before he agrees to send 30,000 troops, he wants to know what the mission and the endgame is.”
Obama promised an extra 7,000-10,000 troops during the election campaign but the military has inflated its demands. Leading Democrats fear Afghanistan could become Obama’s “Vietnam quagmire”.
If the surge goes ahead the military intend to limit the mission to fighting the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and leave democracy building and reconstruction to Nato allies and civilians from the State Department and other agencies.
The United States has been pushing Britain to send several thousand more troops but there is just as much disagreement and confusion among British defence chiefs over the long-term aim. Gordon Brown is set to receive a full briefing this week.
General Sir Richard Dannatt, the army chief who will step down this summer, has insisted that troops need a rest and believes he can send only one battlegroup, senior defence sources said.
General Sir David Richards, his successor, believes that the two extra battlegroups the Americans have asked for is the minimum the UK should send, the sources said.
- Obama: 30,000 More Troops, War Over By Christma --er - Next Election
Of course 30,000 is the bare minimum McChrystal asked for (I think) and dictating a timetable just tells the Taliban how long they need to keep their heads down before we're gone and they can reassert themselves. ("Leave it to the locals" I read somewhere....
- Doubts Mount Over Obama's 'civilian Surge' Strategy For Afghanistan
Newsmax: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:38 PM WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is forging ahead with its civilian surge in Afghanistan but some experts say thousands more are needed while others fear the security situation is making the push ineffective....
- Military: Al-qaida 'very Capable' Of More Attacks
Newsmax: Military: Al-Qaida 'Very Capable' of More Attacks Monday, August 24, 2009 8:35 AM WASHINGTON -- Al-Qaida remains "very capable" of attacking the United States, the senior U.S. military officer said, as he tried to boost waning U.S. support...
- Europe To Obama: "we'll Take A Free Ride"
From Wretchard at the Belmont Club: The Times Online describes NATO’s response to Barack Obama’s impassioned plea to make a stand in Afghanistan. The Allies listened politely, left some small change on the table, then smiled and waved.Barack Obama...
- The Headline In The Nyt Could Have Said "marines Want To Go To Afghanistan"
Instead, hiding what I think is a really good idea the headline was: Marines Press to Remove Their Forces From Iraq By THOM SHANKER WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 — The Marine Corps is pressing to remove its forces from Iraq and to send marines instead...
Green Energy
Forgetting 9/11
Pastorius states below we are fools if we ever forget 9/11. And he is very correct. None of us here have.
Our Appeaser in Chief, however. . .
from the Times Online via Gateway Pundit
Obama puts brake on Afghan surge
PRESIDENT Barack Obama has demanded that American defence chiefs review their strategy in Afghanistan before going ahead with a troop surge.
There is concern among senior Democrats that the military is preparing to send up to 30,000 extra troops without a coherent plan or exit strategy.
The Pentagon was set to announce the deployment of 17,000 extra soldiers and marines last week but Robert Gates, the defence secretary, postponed the decision after questions from Obama.
The president was concerned by a lack of strategy at his first meeting with Gates and the US joint chiefs of staff last month in “the tank”, the secure conference room in the Pentagon. He asked: “What’s the endgame?” and did not receive a convincing answer.
Larry Korb, a defence expert at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank, said: “Obama is exactly right. Before he agrees to send 30,000 troops, he wants to know what the mission and the endgame is.”
Obama promised an extra 7,000-10,000 troops during the election campaign but the military has inflated its demands. Leading Democrats fear Afghanistan could become Obama’s “Vietnam quagmire”.
If the surge goes ahead the military intend to limit the mission to fighting the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and leave democracy building and reconstruction to Nato allies and civilians from the State Department and other agencies.
The United States has been pushing Britain to send several thousand more troops but there is just as much disagreement and confusion among British defence chiefs over the long-term aim. Gordon Brown is set to receive a full briefing this week.
General Sir Richard Dannatt, the army chief who will step down this summer, has insisted that troops need a rest and believes he can send only one battlegroup, senior defence sources said.
General Sir David Richards, his successor, believes that the two extra battlegroups the Americans have asked for is the minimum the UK should send, the sources said.
- Obama: 30,000 More Troops, War Over By Christma --er - Next Election
Of course 30,000 is the bare minimum McChrystal asked for (I think) and dictating a timetable just tells the Taliban how long they need to keep their heads down before we're gone and they can reassert themselves. ("Leave it to the locals" I read somewhere....
- Doubts Mount Over Obama's 'civilian Surge' Strategy For Afghanistan
Newsmax: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:38 PM WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is forging ahead with its civilian surge in Afghanistan but some experts say thousands more are needed while others fear the security situation is making the push ineffective....
- Military: Al-qaida 'very Capable' Of More Attacks
Newsmax: Military: Al-Qaida 'Very Capable' of More Attacks Monday, August 24, 2009 8:35 AM WASHINGTON -- Al-Qaida remains "very capable" of attacking the United States, the senior U.S. military officer said, as he tried to boost waning U.S. support...
- Europe To Obama: "we'll Take A Free Ride"
From Wretchard at the Belmont Club: The Times Online describes NATO’s response to Barack Obama’s impassioned plea to make a stand in Afghanistan. The Allies listened politely, left some small change on the table, then smiled and waved.Barack Obama...
- The Headline In The Nyt Could Have Said "marines Want To Go To Afghanistan"
Instead, hiding what I think is a really good idea the headline was: Marines Press to Remove Their Forces From Iraq By THOM SHANKER WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 — The Marine Corps is pressing to remove its forces from Iraq and to send marines instead...