NYT Front Page Editorial ULTIMATE DOUBLE DOWN - "No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation."
NY Times Editorial Today
Does the subject even matter after this?
Perhaps we should restrict and regulate freedom of speech from suggesting impingement on the Bill of Rights?
Or eliminate or regulate birthright citizenship.
This is the kind of logic we are seeing from the NYT
Of course they want to deal with the 2nd Amendment of a Bill of Rights so important Jefferson told Madison the Constitution was unacceptable without the 1st 10 Amendments he worked with Madison on, being ratified WITH IT.
Why?
Because those rights are COMPULSORY to protect individuals and small minorities from BOTH the govt and the majority.
And the NYT wants to regulate the protection of individuals and minorities, and for that regulation to come from the EXACT INSTITUTION those Amendments exist to protect each one of us from.
Let’s start with regulation of the bona fides of editorial boards of newspapers by whatever govt is elected by the people that year?
- Ny Times … Bill Of Rights Is For Extremists
Charles Blow:That sound you hear is the sound of a cultural paranoia by people who have lost their grip on the reins of power, and on reality, and who fear the worst is coming.And they are preparing for it, whatever it may be — a war, a revolution,...
