The World Wars of the 20th century had physically and emotionally exhausted the European nations. After tens of millions have died and billions of dollars in property destroyed, 21st century
Like in the 1930s, the disease of appeasement has infected all of the free world today - its political leadership, main stream media, educational and cultural institutions, and even its entertainment industry. This reluctance to confront the common enemy of the Islamists who seek to dominate the world through their religion, stems from a real fear of a destructive clash between civilizations – between a 21st century civilization and a 13th century one.
Appeasement is not a softening up tactic itself. It is the end result of disinformation and intimidation tactics used by the Islamists and leads the free world into doubt and inaction in the face of the threat.
Circa: 1930s
Hitler rose to power on disinformation campaign of victimhood. Hitler partially blamed the distressed of affairs of
The European response to his Hitler’s ranting was an ‘understanding’ and the ‘moral’ justification for the West's appeasement attitude that followed. - mainly in the belief that the time had come for the revision of the unjust peace treaty. This ‘understanding’ and the desperate need to avoid another war, forced the democratic European nations into inaction without the moral strength to band together for the common good to defeat what only a few had seen as a growing threat to peace and justice.
Unfortunately, it’s the same today.
Circa: Today
Over the last few years, the pace of appeasing the Islamists and Muslims in general has increased dramatically. Believing the victim claims of the Muslims from their press and pulpits, the free world under the banner of multiculturalism, has bent over backwards to please their Muslim populations who claim that the behavior of democratic institutions and the values they hold have made them ‘uncomfortable’ in some cases, and incensed in others.
Instead of Muslims assimilating into the democratic cultures that they emigrate to, the reverse is happing in many free world nations, especially in Europe – the Islamists are forcing us to assimilate to their culture, changing the very tone and semantics of the rights of the democratic nations in the process (see examples below). Under multiculturalism, everyone is the same and all cultures are separate but equal. But the end result of multiculturalism was to reduce in importance western civilization and its religions in order to bring other cultures up. But the majority of Muslim immigrants to the free world Islam show little sign of wanting to participate in this Utopian world of multiculturalism. They, instead, want to have their culture be the dominate one and refuse to co-exist. The democratic world is in danger of losing its identity for the sake of perfect multicultural ideal that Islam does not buy into.
When the Islamists are made to feel uncomfortable in the modern world, the apologists (read appeasers) in the free world make up all kinds of excuses for Muslim behavior. "We must have done something to offend them", or "Islam is a religion of peace", or "Islam is no different from any other religion" or "We must find out what they want".
As one anonymous blogger has said, “We know what they want - the destruction of our civilization and culture and a descent to the Dark Ages of Sharia worldwide and all the evil it would bring. We are heading towards being the first civilization in human history to be complicit in our own destruction. We're too soft and namby-pamby here in the West, and the likes of Churchill would be appalled if he could come back to life and spend a week in 2006.
Here are some recent attempts as appeasement ending with a democratic nation corroding its national values In the name of multiculturalism.
In short, European countries are losing their national unity – a multicultural rot from within. Blankly writes further that those who've given their blood, sweat and tears to build up the great country of
When you preach diversity you get a balkanized country. The damage to the mores and morals of Western Civilization by multiculturalism is a natural outcome of a policy that puts political correctness before common sense. By substituting Judeo-Christian values with PC and multiculturalism a secular society that believes in nothing is easy prey and can be overrun by fanatic society that believes strongly in their cause.
Finally, here’s what happens when unrestrained appeasement turns into delusion. The European Union in its attempt to placate the Islamists has removed ‘Islamic Terrorism’ from its Dictionary.
In a strange way, the appeasers and apologists for Islam have introduced Orwell’s concept of Newspeak. Orwell writes in his book 1984, “The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meaning whatever.”
To give a single example - The word free still existed in Newspeak, but could only be used in such statements as "The dog is free from lice" or "This field is free from weeds." It could not be used in its old sense of "politically free" or "intellectually free," since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Newspeak was founded on the English language as we now know it, though many Newspeak sentences, even when not containing newly created words, would be barely intelligible to an English-speaker of our own day.”
Welcome to January 1984.