Washington Post Editorial Asks, Is Obamacare UnConstitutional?
From Washington Post:
President Obama has called for a serious and reasoned debate about his plans to overhaul the health-care system. Any such debate must include the question of whether it is constitutional for the federal government to adopt and implement the president's proposals. Consider one element known as the "individual mandate," which would require every American to have health insurance, if not through an employer then by individual purchase. This requirement would particularly affect young adults, who often choose to save the expense and go without coverage. Without the young to subsidize the old, a comprehensive national health system will not work. But can Congress require every American to buy health insurance?In short, no. The Constitution assigns only limited, enumerated powers to Congress and none, including the power to regulate interstate commerce or to impose taxes, would support a federal mandate requiring anyone who is otherwise without health insurance to buy it.
Although the Supreme Court has interpreted Congress's commerce power expansively, this type of mandate would not pass muster even under the most aggressive commerce clause cases. In Wickard v. Filburn (1942), the court upheld a federal law regulating the national wheat markets. The law was drawn so broadly that wheat grown for consumption on individual farms also was regulated. Even though this rule reached purely local (rather than interstate) activity, the court reasoned that the consumption of homegrown wheat by individual farms would, in the aggregate, have a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce, and so was within Congress's reach.
The court reaffirmed this rationale in 2005 in Gonzales v. Raich, when it validated Congress's authority to regulate the home cultivation of marijuana for personal use. In doing so, however, the justices emphasized that -- as in the wheat case -- "the activities regulated by the [Controlled Substances Act] are quintessentially economic." That simply would not be true with regard to an individual health insurance mandate.
The otherwise uninsured would be required to buy coverage, not because they were even tangentially engaged in the "production, distribution or consumption of commodities," but for no other reason than that people without health insurance exist. The federal government does not have the power to regulate Americans simply because they are there.
Go read the whole thing.
- Federal Judge:obamacare Unconstitutional
A couple weeks ago and this would have been the BIG story of the day. . . Newsmax: Fla. Judge Strikes Down Health Overhaul Monday, 31 Jan 2011 PENSACOLA, Fla. – A federal judge ruled Monday that the Obama administration's health care overhaul is...
- Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstituional
We knew that. . . Yahoo: Judge in Va. strikes down federal health care law By LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press Larry O'dell, Associated Press – 11 mins ago RICHMOND, Va. – A federal judge declared the Obama administration's health care law...
- Obamacare Constitutional? Federal Judge Rules Against Virginia's Challenge To Individual Mandate
BULLSHIT! Am I the only one who is noticing that our government has stepped way beyond the line, way beyond what the British government did to those who started the American Revolution? Here's my individual mandate: The government will not tell me...
- Could Scotus Be The Death Panel For Health-care Reform?
From Talking Points Memo: Now that President Obama has signed health-care reform into law, opponents of the bill are pinning their hopes of stopping it on a last-ditch legal strategy. A group of 13 state attorneys general has filed suit (pdf), arguing...
-
Newsmax: Massive State-Level Revolt Brewing Against Obamacare Thursday, 18 Mar 2010 By: David A. Patten Dozens of states are considering laws to legally ban the individual insurance mandate that lies at the heart of President Obama's proposed overhaul...