Green Energy
- The Delusions Of Obamacare Supporters: One ‘realist’ Josh Marshall
Why Josh Marshall believes TODAY that Obamacare will be a success (italics are my response).No way to repeal until Jan 2017 i.e. Obama can override any veto of a repub senate and congress..PROBABLYInsurance companies are locked in. Insurance...
- Obama's World Today: "total And Unmitigated Disaster"
Today's New York Post From Ace: So far, state insurance commissioners in Washington state, D.C., Arkansas, andVermont -- all of them Democrats -- have rejected Obama's "fix" to Obamacare that guts the exchanges. Obama has summoned...
- Poll: Only 12% Support Implementing Obamacare’s Individual Mandate
Only 12% of Americans support the Individual Mandate, and Obama himself doesn't support the Employer Mandate, SO WHAT'S LEFT? Fuckin' aye, this is a stupid piece of shit law. From The Hill: A new survey finds only 12 percent support...
- The Next Set Of Obama Attack Commercials
MEDICARE, and vouchers.Be ready Mitt ..Pauly.Even in a state like Ohio with about 35-40 health insurance companies health care costs are high, and you are asking people as old as 54 to eschew any nervous sensation they have in the pit of their stomachs...
- Did Scotus Just Allow A Tax Only On People Too Poor To Buy A Specific Service?
Answering Epaminodas' question: The way I understand this, SCOTUS just allowed the administration to raise taxes on those who can least afford it. The very poor and lower middle class, the 25-30 million un(der)employed who cannot afford to buy insurance...
Green Energy
A morass of a decision?
If I cannot afford individual health insurance (about 750-1300/month in this state) the government CANNOT force me to do buy it (that is now unconstitutional), but they can fine me for not being able to afford it, and the state mechanism which compels states to form low cost exchanges (because individual insurance is so expensive ,...and undertake much more costs) is not constitutional either.
Doesn't this mean that the PRECISE PEOPLE who this act was aimed at, those who have no health insurance specifically because they cannot afford it, are SPECIFICALLY SCREWED?
Doesn't this mean that the PRECISE PEOPLE who this act was aimed at, those who have no health insurance specifically because they cannot afford it, are SPECIFICALLY SCREWED?
Am I missing something in what has to be, if I am correct a COMPLETELY inconsistent baby sliced in half?
- The Delusions Of Obamacare Supporters: One ‘realist’ Josh Marshall
Why Josh Marshall believes TODAY that Obamacare will be a success (italics are my response).No way to repeal until Jan 2017 i.e. Obama can override any veto of a repub senate and congress..PROBABLYInsurance companies are locked in. Insurance...
- Obama's World Today: "total And Unmitigated Disaster"
Today's New York Post From Ace: So far, state insurance commissioners in Washington state, D.C., Arkansas, andVermont -- all of them Democrats -- have rejected Obama's "fix" to Obamacare that guts the exchanges. Obama has summoned...
- Poll: Only 12% Support Implementing Obamacare’s Individual Mandate
Only 12% of Americans support the Individual Mandate, and Obama himself doesn't support the Employer Mandate, SO WHAT'S LEFT? Fuckin' aye, this is a stupid piece of shit law. From The Hill: A new survey finds only 12 percent support...
- The Next Set Of Obama Attack Commercials
MEDICARE, and vouchers.Be ready Mitt ..Pauly.Even in a state like Ohio with about 35-40 health insurance companies health care costs are high, and you are asking people as old as 54 to eschew any nervous sensation they have in the pit of their stomachs...
- Did Scotus Just Allow A Tax Only On People Too Poor To Buy A Specific Service?
Answering Epaminodas' question: The way I understand this, SCOTUS just allowed the administration to raise taxes on those who can least afford it. The very poor and lower middle class, the 25-30 million un(der)employed who cannot afford to buy insurance...