The Dhimmis At The WaPo
Green Energy

The Dhimmis At The WaPo


So what else is new?

Via Jihad Watch (emphases mine):

In "5 Myths About Terrorism" in the [September 11, 2007] Washington Post (thanks to Steve), Alan B. Krueger provides a sterling example of the politically correct myopia that prevents an accurate analysis of the global jihad and Islamic supremacism. And he does so in such a clumsy way that it is remarkable that no one at the paper caught this before it was printed:

4. Terrorism is mainly perpetrated by Muslims.
Wrong. No religion has a monopoly on terrorism. Every major religious faith has had followers involved in terrorism. (Sri Lanka, for instance, has grappled for decades with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, a separatist group that pioneered suicide bombing as a terrorist tactic and hopes to create a homeland for the country's mostly Tamil minority, who are largely Hindu.) Although radical Islamic terrorists are the worry du jour because of 9/11 and Iraq, the data show pretty clearly that the predominant religion of a country is not a good predictor of whether its people will become involved in terrorism.

After all, it was not long ago that homegrown villains such as Timothy McVeigh and the so-called Unabomber were the most notorious terrorists. That makes sense; the vast majority of terrorist incidents are local, motivated by local concerns and carried out by natives. Even international terrorist events tend to be local affairs, most frequently carried out by local militants who target foreigners who happen to be in their country. (Just think of last week's foiled plot to attack U.S. targets in Germany.) This suggests that the likelihood of attack by homegrown terrorists is far greater than the threat of another 9/11-style attack by foreigners.

Did you catch that? Terrorism isn't "mainly perpetrated by Muslims" because "no religion has a monopoly on terrorism." This doesn't even establish what Krueger wants it to establish, because the fact that people of all religions have committed terrorist acts doesn't disprove the contention that terrorism is mainly perpetrated by Muslims. If one group is responsible for something, say, 80% of the time, it is mainly responsible for it: you can't point to the existence of the other 20% as if it were proof that the 80% group is not mainly responsible.

Read the rest at Always On Watch. I've added some info from the September 15, 2007 edition of the WaPo.





- Obama Admin Ignoring Domestic Islamist Terror Threat?
Gertz:The Obama administration has failed to fully understand the homegrown terrorism threat posed by Islamist extremists, notably by mischaracterizing the terror attack carried out by a Muslim U.S. Army major, according to a new Republican House report.GO...

- Andrew Belonsky Doesn't Think Whites Can Be Muslims, Or Something Like That
Once again, moonbat Andrew Belonsky is determined to attack conservatives as nearsighted in his take on the case of 4 "probably white Americans" who were arrested in Georgia for plotting to attack government buildings with ricin. Among the things he says:...

- In Which I Agree With The Obama Admin: It Is Not Terrorism
This naive admin has been loathe to use the word terrorism at all, and has avoided it to the exclusion of reality.However in discussing the ‘events’ around Nidal Hassan, Fazi, this Kosovar moron in Germany the admin is correct that they should be...

- Uk "faith" Schools May Breed Terrorism
I'm with Mark Alexander on this one. Faith schools WILL breed terrorism. The Conservatives who want to establish the school voucher intiative are inviting a Tower of Babel into the United States. Look it's already happening in the UK. From...

- Storm Track Disinformation: What Makes A Terrorist?
What makes a terrorist? Hatred of our freedoms? Gripes about colonialism? Poverty? Religion? All of the above? No. What makes a terrorist is the same thing that makes a Nazi, a Communist, a fascist, or a Maoist. What makes them all the same is an...



Green Energy








.